Science of international law – since ancient times!

B. Krivokapich
{"title":"Science of international law – since ancient times!","authors":"B. Krivokapich","doi":"10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-1-49-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern doctrine, the emergence of science of international law in the ancient world is often overlooked or even outright denied. However, the most ancient legal treaties contain separate norms of international law, the formulation and application of which should have been carried out by specialists familiar with past and existing practice. In connection with the above, it seems relevant to understand the issue of the moment when the science of international law emerged. It is advisable to conduct a study of the works of ancient philosophers and legal scholars to formulate conclusions that international law has existed since the formation of the first states and is a consequence of the transfer of basic legal principles from domestic relations to external interstate ones. The research methodology is determined by its sources. The use of comparative, formal legal, historical research methods made it possible to achieve this goal. Based on the names and works of thinkers of ancient countries (China, India, Greece, Rome), it is argued that international legal thought existed in the ancient world. In conclusion, it is concluded that neither international law, nor its science were created in Europe in the XVIXVII centuries, as some researchers say. Both the emergence itself and the study of international law are objective processes that political life demanded and generated much earlier.","PeriodicalId":406056,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-1-49-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In modern doctrine, the emergence of science of international law in the ancient world is often overlooked or even outright denied. However, the most ancient legal treaties contain separate norms of international law, the formulation and application of which should have been carried out by specialists familiar with past and existing practice. In connection with the above, it seems relevant to understand the issue of the moment when the science of international law emerged. It is advisable to conduct a study of the works of ancient philosophers and legal scholars to formulate conclusions that international law has existed since the formation of the first states and is a consequence of the transfer of basic legal principles from domestic relations to external interstate ones. The research methodology is determined by its sources. The use of comparative, formal legal, historical research methods made it possible to achieve this goal. Based on the names and works of thinkers of ancient countries (China, India, Greece, Rome), it is argued that international legal thought existed in the ancient world. In conclusion, it is concluded that neither international law, nor its science were created in Europe in the XVIXVII centuries, as some researchers say. Both the emergence itself and the study of international law are objective processes that political life demanded and generated much earlier.
国际法科学——自古以来!
在现代学说中,古代世界国际法科学的出现往往被忽视,甚至被彻底否认。然而,最古老的法律条约载有单独的国际法准则,这些准则的制订和适用本应由熟悉过去和现有惯例的专家进行。在上述情况下,理解国际法科学出现的时刻的问题似乎是相关的。对古代哲学家和法律学者的著作进行研究,得出这样的结论是明智的:国际法自第一批国家形成以来就存在,是基本法律原则从国内关系转移到外部国家关系的结果。研究方法由资料来源决定。使用比较的、正式的法律的、历史的研究方法使实现这一目标成为可能。本文根据古代各国(中国、印度、希腊、罗马)思想家的姓名和著作,认为国际法律思想在古代世界是存在的。总之,我们得出的结论是,国际法和国际法科学都不是像一些研究人员所说的那样,在十七世纪在欧洲创立的。国际法的出现本身和国际法的研究都是政治生活所要求和产生的客观过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信