ADAPTATION OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION PEDAGOGY IN ADDRESSING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Soad ABOKHAMIS MOUSAVI, Pooya Lotfabadi
{"title":"ADAPTATION OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION PEDAGOGY IN ADDRESSING COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"Soad ABOKHAMIS MOUSAVI, Pooya Lotfabadi","doi":"10.31681/jetol.1150608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a worldwide pandemic in March 2020. As a result, all educational establishments have been expected to finish the 2019-20 spring semester online. Despite the significance of distance education, it appears that online education has not assisted architecture education adequately. This is due to the fact that it has higher learning objectives, is taught via coaching approaches, and incorporates nonverbal communication. Architects are trained through a method focused on the ‘studio course’. In this environment, students’ decisions are unintentionally affected by the unanticipated backtalk and discussions that arise from the design development process. In other words, criticism, which is a graphic and oral communication between the students and the instructor, is one of the most frequent learning strategies utilized in the design studio. The pedagogically distinctive implications of digital design have prompted the need for new educational frameworks in architecture. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to monitor and document current trends, benefits, and limitations of online architectural discourse and learning ecosystems from both students’ and tutors’ perspectives. It also investigates alternative pedagogical agendas in order to address the requirement to integrate different levels of students with online education. In this regard, the effects of the design medium, knowledge-based or theoretical courses, and practical courses are three common types of influences on educational system adaptability and inertia. Finally, in this research, authors attempt to formulate a theoretical framework and didactic principles for the modification of architectural online education by using multiple methods of data collection, primarily based on a systematic observation of the experiments, questioning the participants before and after the experiment, and evaluate of the descriptive results of the experiment.","PeriodicalId":432949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1150608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a worldwide pandemic in March 2020. As a result, all educational establishments have been expected to finish the 2019-20 spring semester online. Despite the significance of distance education, it appears that online education has not assisted architecture education adequately. This is due to the fact that it has higher learning objectives, is taught via coaching approaches, and incorporates nonverbal communication. Architects are trained through a method focused on the ‘studio course’. In this environment, students’ decisions are unintentionally affected by the unanticipated backtalk and discussions that arise from the design development process. In other words, criticism, which is a graphic and oral communication between the students and the instructor, is one of the most frequent learning strategies utilized in the design studio. The pedagogically distinctive implications of digital design have prompted the need for new educational frameworks in architecture. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to monitor and document current trends, benefits, and limitations of online architectural discourse and learning ecosystems from both students’ and tutors’ perspectives. It also investigates alternative pedagogical agendas in order to address the requirement to integrate different levels of students with online education. In this regard, the effects of the design medium, knowledge-based or theoretical courses, and practical courses are three common types of influences on educational system adaptability and inertia. Finally, in this research, authors attempt to formulate a theoretical framework and didactic principles for the modification of architectural online education by using multiple methods of data collection, primarily based on a systematic observation of the experiments, questioning the participants before and after the experiment, and evaluate of the descriptive results of the experiment.
建筑教育教学法在应对COVID-19大流行中的适应性
世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2020年3月宣布新冠肺炎疫情为全球大流行。因此,预计所有教育机构都将在线完成2019- 2020年春季学期。尽管远程教育具有重要意义,但在线教育似乎并没有充分地辅助建筑教育。这是因为它有更高的学习目标,通过教练的方法来教授,并结合了非语言交际。建筑师通过专注于“工作室课程”的方法进行培训。在这种环境下,学生的决定会在无意中受到设计开发过程中出现的意想不到的反驳和讨论的影响。换句话说,批评是学生和教师之间的一种图形和口头交流,是设计工作室中最常用的学习策略之一。数字设计在教学上的独特含义促使人们需要新的建筑教育框架。因此,本研究的主要目的是从学生和导师的角度来监测和记录当前的趋势、好处和在线建筑话语和学习生态系统的局限性。它还研究了不同的教学议程,以解决不同层次的学生与在线教育相结合的要求。在这方面,设计媒介、知识型或理论性课程和实践性课程的影响是影响教育系统适应性和惯性的三种常见类型。最后,在本研究中,作者试图通过多种数据收集方法,主要基于对实验的系统观察,对实验前后的参与者进行询问,并对实验的描述性结果进行评估,来制定一个修改建筑在线教育的理论框架和教学原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书