The effect of differentiated instruction approach on students’ academic achievement and attitudes: A meta-analysis study

Sayed Shafiullah Safawi, C. Akay
{"title":"The effect of differentiated instruction approach on students’ academic achievement and attitudes: A meta-analysis study","authors":"Sayed Shafiullah Safawi, C. Akay","doi":"10.31248/ijet2022.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to study the effect of differentiated instruction approaches on students’ academic achievement and attitudes in this meta-analysis, CoHE Thesis Center, Google Scholar, Dergi Park, Research Gate, and ERIC search engines were used to retrieve studies published in Turkey between 2010 and 2021. Out of 23 quantitative studies selected, 10 experimental and 13 quasi-experimental studies focused on students’ academic achievement and eight quantitative studies comprising three experimental and five quasi-experimental studies focused on students’ attitudes. These studies measured the pretest-posttest differences between the experimental and control groups using parametric tests such as t-test, ANOVA, and ANCOVA. The effect sizes were examined under a random-effects model, using Cohen's d and Hedges’ g indexes. According to the results, the analyses yielded a moderate effect size value of 0.791 for academic achievement and a small effect size value of 0.359 for attitude, and the overall effect size favoured the experimental group. In studies included in the analysis, the interventions lasted from 2 to 12 weeks, and the meta-regression analysis results showed that the longer the intervention duration, the more positively the academic achievement and attitude of the students are affected. However, its effect on attitude is greater than its effect on academic achievement.","PeriodicalId":344221,"journal":{"name":"Integrity Journal of Education and Training","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrity Journal of Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31248/ijet2022.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to study the effect of differentiated instruction approaches on students’ academic achievement and attitudes in this meta-analysis, CoHE Thesis Center, Google Scholar, Dergi Park, Research Gate, and ERIC search engines were used to retrieve studies published in Turkey between 2010 and 2021. Out of 23 quantitative studies selected, 10 experimental and 13 quasi-experimental studies focused on students’ academic achievement and eight quantitative studies comprising three experimental and five quasi-experimental studies focused on students’ attitudes. These studies measured the pretest-posttest differences between the experimental and control groups using parametric tests such as t-test, ANOVA, and ANCOVA. The effect sizes were examined under a random-effects model, using Cohen's d and Hedges’ g indexes. According to the results, the analyses yielded a moderate effect size value of 0.791 for academic achievement and a small effect size value of 0.359 for attitude, and the overall effect size favoured the experimental group. In studies included in the analysis, the interventions lasted from 2 to 12 weeks, and the meta-regression analysis results showed that the longer the intervention duration, the more positively the academic achievement and attitude of the students are affected. However, its effect on attitude is greater than its effect on academic achievement.
差别化教学方式对学生学业成绩和学习态度的影响:一项元分析研究
为了在本荟萃分析中研究差异化教学方法对学生学业成绩和态度的影响,我们使用CoHE Thesis Center、谷歌Scholar、Dergi Park、Research Gate和ERIC搜索引擎检索了2010年至2021年在土耳其发表的研究。在入选的23项定量研究中,有10项实验研究和13项准实验研究关注学生的学业成绩,8项定量研究(包括3项实验研究和5项准实验研究)关注学生的态度。这些研究使用参数检验(如t检验、方差分析和方差分析)来测量实验组和对照组之间的前后检验差异。使用Cohen's d和Hedges 's g指数,在随机效应模型下检验了效应大小。结果显示,学业成绩的中等效应值为0.791,态度的小效应值为0.359,总体效应值偏向实验组。在纳入分析的研究中,干预时间从2周到12周不等,meta回归分析结果显示,干预时间越长,对学生学业成绩和学习态度的积极影响越大。然而,它对态度的影响大于对学业成绩的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信