(Near) optimal resource-competitive broadcast with jamming

Seth Gilbert, Valerie King, S. Pettie, E. Porat, Jared Saia, Maxwell Young
{"title":"(Near) optimal resource-competitive broadcast with jamming","authors":"Seth Gilbert, Valerie King, S. Pettie, E. Porat, Jared Saia, Maxwell Young","doi":"10.1145/2612669.2612679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of broadcasting a message from a sender to n ≥ 1 receivers in a time-slotted, single-hop, wireless network with a single communication channel. Sending and listening dominate the energy usage of small wireless devices and this is abstracted as a unit cost per time slot. A jamming adversary exists who can disrupt the channel at unit cost per time slot, and aims to prevent the transmission of the message. Let T be the number of slots jammed by the adversary. Our goal is to design algorithms whose cost is resource-competitive, that is, whose per-device cost is a function, preferably o(T), of the adversary's cost. Devices must work with limited knowledge. The values n, T, and the adversary's jamming strategy are unknown. For 1-to-1 communication, we provide an algorithm with an expected cost of O(√Tln(1/ε) + ln (1/ε)), which succeeds with probability at least 1-ε for any tunable parameter ε>0. For 1-to-n broadcast, we provide a very different algorithm that succeeds with high probability and yields an expected cost per device of O(√T/n log 4 T + log6 n). Therefore, the bigger the system, the better advantage achieved over the adversary! We complement our upper bounds with tight or nearly tight lower bounds. We prove that any 1-to-1 communication algorithm with constant probability of success has expected cost Ω (√T). For 1-to-n broadcast we show that some node has cost Ω(√T). Finally, we consider a more powerful adversary that can spoof messages from the receiver, rather than just jam the channel. We prove that any 1-to-1 communication algorithm in this model has expected cost Ω(Tφ-1), where φ = 1+√5 ∕ 2 is the golden ratio. This matches an earlier upper bound of King, Saia, and Young.","PeriodicalId":210628,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 26th ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 26th ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2612669.2612679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

We consider the problem of broadcasting a message from a sender to n ≥ 1 receivers in a time-slotted, single-hop, wireless network with a single communication channel. Sending and listening dominate the energy usage of small wireless devices and this is abstracted as a unit cost per time slot. A jamming adversary exists who can disrupt the channel at unit cost per time slot, and aims to prevent the transmission of the message. Let T be the number of slots jammed by the adversary. Our goal is to design algorithms whose cost is resource-competitive, that is, whose per-device cost is a function, preferably o(T), of the adversary's cost. Devices must work with limited knowledge. The values n, T, and the adversary's jamming strategy are unknown. For 1-to-1 communication, we provide an algorithm with an expected cost of O(√Tln(1/ε) + ln (1/ε)), which succeeds with probability at least 1-ε for any tunable parameter ε>0. For 1-to-n broadcast, we provide a very different algorithm that succeeds with high probability and yields an expected cost per device of O(√T/n log 4 T + log6 n). Therefore, the bigger the system, the better advantage achieved over the adversary! We complement our upper bounds with tight or nearly tight lower bounds. We prove that any 1-to-1 communication algorithm with constant probability of success has expected cost Ω (√T). For 1-to-n broadcast we show that some node has cost Ω(√T). Finally, we consider a more powerful adversary that can spoof messages from the receiver, rather than just jam the channel. We prove that any 1-to-1 communication algorithm in this model has expected cost Ω(Tφ-1), where φ = 1+√5 ∕ 2 is the golden ratio. This matches an earlier upper bound of King, Saia, and Young.
(近)最优资源竞争广播干扰
我们考虑在一个时隙、单跳、具有单一通信信道的无线网络中,从一个发送者向n≥1个接收者广播消息的问题。发送和监听主导着小型无线设备的能量使用,这被抽象为每个时隙的单位成本。干扰对手能够以每个时隙的单位成本干扰信道,其目的是阻止信息的传输。设T为对手卡住的槽数。我们的目标是设计成本具有资源竞争性的算法,也就是说,每台设备的成本是对手成本的函数,最好是0 (T)。设备必须在有限的知识下工作。n, T的值和对手的干扰策略是未知的。对于1对1通信,我们提供了一个期望代价为O(√Tln(1/ε) + ln(1/ε))的算法,对于任何可调参数ε>0,该算法成功的概率至少为1-ε。对于1对n广播,我们提供了一种非常不同的算法,该算法成功的概率很高,每台设备的预期成本为0(√T/n log 4t + log6n)。因此,系统越大,对对手的优势就越大!我们用紧或接近紧的下界来补充上界。我们证明了任何具有恒定成功概率的1对1通信算法都具有期望成本Ω(√T)。对于1对n广播,我们证明某个节点的成本为Ω(√T)。最后,我们考虑一个更强大的对手,它可以欺骗来自接收器的消息,而不仅仅是干扰信道。证明了该模型中任意1对1通信算法的期望代价为Ω(Tφ-1),其中φ = 1+√5∕2为黄金分割率。这与King, Saia和Young的上界相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信