An Ephemeral Conceptualization of Phule’s Understanding of Socio-Cultural Structure: Brahman Supremacy, Caste & Tradition and Role of Education

J. Ashu
{"title":"An Ephemeral Conceptualization of Phule’s Understanding of Socio-Cultural Structure: Brahman Supremacy, Caste & Tradition and Role of Education","authors":"J. Ashu","doi":"10.46700/asssr/2020/v2/i1/196112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jotirao Phule born in 1827 into a family of gardener (mali) caste in Maharashtra. A caste which eventually had a very distinct position in the Maharashtrian society that particularly in that point of time because of the fact that these members lived closely by cultivation and selling fruits and flowers and thus, was largely concerned with rural cultivation and also with a large market in the urban. Jotirao Phule’s selected writings tends to be very useful in understanding the cultural and social milieu of 19th century. The caste system continued to be a belief that human beings are organized in a hierarchy ordained by divine indulgence which is one of the more abandoned and challenging areas of India social history. Phule seems to endure as one of the few prevailing and significant voice that particularly transformed the history of Dalit discourses in India. Jotirao Phule’s writing precisely in Ghulamgiri (Slavery), Shetkaryacha Asud (Cultivator’s Whipcord), Jati (Caste) and Dharma (Religion) played a vital role in terms of intellectual and academic output that worked as a voice of marginalized people in the society during the 19th century. Phule’s writing is very much restricted to a kind of anti-Brahmanical in nature. His understanding of the social structure during the 19th century was a sort of anti-Brahmanical in nature and further suggesting how influential were Brahmans during that particular retro. This paper will precisely focus on looking into the social implications and the extrapolations focused by the Phule over the underprivileged sections and his replication on the problems of caste. At the same time also focuses on understanding how Phule treated class-based discernment and how education as suggested by Phule a key factor in permitting class-based discrimination during the 19th century.","PeriodicalId":132109,"journal":{"name":"Asiatic Society for Social Science Research (ASSSR)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiatic Society for Social Science Research (ASSSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46700/asssr/2020/v2/i1/196112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jotirao Phule born in 1827 into a family of gardener (mali) caste in Maharashtra. A caste which eventually had a very distinct position in the Maharashtrian society that particularly in that point of time because of the fact that these members lived closely by cultivation and selling fruits and flowers and thus, was largely concerned with rural cultivation and also with a large market in the urban. Jotirao Phule’s selected writings tends to be very useful in understanding the cultural and social milieu of 19th century. The caste system continued to be a belief that human beings are organized in a hierarchy ordained by divine indulgence which is one of the more abandoned and challenging areas of India social history. Phule seems to endure as one of the few prevailing and significant voice that particularly transformed the history of Dalit discourses in India. Jotirao Phule’s writing precisely in Ghulamgiri (Slavery), Shetkaryacha Asud (Cultivator’s Whipcord), Jati (Caste) and Dharma (Religion) played a vital role in terms of intellectual and academic output that worked as a voice of marginalized people in the society during the 19th century. Phule’s writing is very much restricted to a kind of anti-Brahmanical in nature. His understanding of the social structure during the 19th century was a sort of anti-Brahmanical in nature and further suggesting how influential were Brahmans during that particular retro. This paper will precisely focus on looking into the social implications and the extrapolations focused by the Phule over the underprivileged sections and his replication on the problems of caste. At the same time also focuses on understanding how Phule treated class-based discernment and how education as suggested by Phule a key factor in permitting class-based discrimination during the 19th century.
普勒对社会文化结构理解的短暂概念化:婆罗门至上、种姓与传统以及教育的作用
Jotirao Phule于1827年出生在马哈拉施特拉邦的一个园丁(马里)种姓家庭。这个种姓最终在马哈拉施特拉邦社会中占有非常独特的地位,特别是在那个时候因为这些成员靠种植和出售水果和鲜花为生,因此,他们主要关注农村的种植,也关注城市的大型市场。Jotirao Phule的作品选集往往对理解19世纪的文化和社会环境非常有用。种姓制度仍然是一种信仰,认为人类是由神的纵容按等级组织起来的,这是印度社会历史上最被抛弃和最具挑战性的领域之一。Phule似乎是少数几个特别改变了印度达利特话语历史的主流和重要声音之一。Jotirao Phule在Ghulamgiri(奴隶制),Shetkaryacha Asud(修炼者的鞭绳),Jati(种姓)和Dharma(宗教)方面的写作在知识和学术产出方面发挥了至关重要的作用,为19世纪社会中边缘化的人们发出了声音。普勒的写作本质上是一种反婆罗门的写作。他对19世纪社会结构的理解本质上是一种反婆罗门的理解,并进一步表明婆罗门在那个特殊的复古时期是多么有影响力。这篇论文将精确地聚焦于研究Phule对弱势群体的社会影响和推断,以及他对种姓问题的复制。同时也着重于理解普勒如何对待基于阶级的辨别,以及普勒所建议的教育如何成为19世纪允许基于阶级的歧视的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信