{"title":"Skills for Citizenship? Writing Instruction and Civic Dispositions in Aotearoa New Zealand","authors":"H. Gerrard","doi":"10.37514/atd-j.2019.16.3.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers an overview of a first-year writing course in Aotearoa New Zealand, Tū Kupu: Writing and Inquiry, which forms part of a core Bachelor of Arts (BA) curriculum with “citizenship” as a key theme. I situate the course in the context of the tertiary sector in Aotearoa New Zealand, and the social and political contexts for teaching here, analysing how these contexts deeply inform the sense of “the civic” that we engage in writing instruction. In particular, I account for neoliberal trends in higher education and the complexities of citizenship, including the multiple and sometimes competing kinds of belonging, participation, and publics we invoke when we name citizenship as a teaching focus, and the role of writing in their enactment. My broadest claim is that this set of complexities is a useful one to illuminate the multifaceted work of writing instruction in this country. In addition, in three sections, this article works through some of the institutional and policy demands on writing instruction, the competing accounts of citizenship that we might engage, and how our assignments, text choices, and workshop pedagogy model civic engagement and frame writing in terms of inquiry and collectivity, amid shifting frames and hierarchies of belonging, and questions about the role of the university. Whāia nei te ia o te kupu i whakatauākīhia e Tā Āpirana Ngata Ko tō ringa ko te rākau a te Pākehā Hei ora mō tō tinana Pursue the essence of Sir Āpirana Ngata’s quote Put your hand to the pen As a means to well being This epigraph was given to our first-year writing course as part of a curriculum development process, and begins our course guide, welcoming students and establishing a bicultural foundation to the course – as does the course title, Tū Kupu: Writing and Inquiry. For students and teachers of writing, and for me writing now, it’s a challenge: to come to wellbeing, and to cross worlds, is to ask much of writing. It’s an evocation, not of a static form but an act – and the conviction or bravery needed to reach out to write.","PeriodicalId":201634,"journal":{"name":"Across the Disciplines","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Across the Disciplines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/atd-j.2019.16.3.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article offers an overview of a first-year writing course in Aotearoa New Zealand, Tū Kupu: Writing and Inquiry, which forms part of a core Bachelor of Arts (BA) curriculum with “citizenship” as a key theme. I situate the course in the context of the tertiary sector in Aotearoa New Zealand, and the social and political contexts for teaching here, analysing how these contexts deeply inform the sense of “the civic” that we engage in writing instruction. In particular, I account for neoliberal trends in higher education and the complexities of citizenship, including the multiple and sometimes competing kinds of belonging, participation, and publics we invoke when we name citizenship as a teaching focus, and the role of writing in their enactment. My broadest claim is that this set of complexities is a useful one to illuminate the multifaceted work of writing instruction in this country. In addition, in three sections, this article works through some of the institutional and policy demands on writing instruction, the competing accounts of citizenship that we might engage, and how our assignments, text choices, and workshop pedagogy model civic engagement and frame writing in terms of inquiry and collectivity, amid shifting frames and hierarchies of belonging, and questions about the role of the university. Whāia nei te ia o te kupu i whakatauākīhia e Tā Āpirana Ngata Ko tō ringa ko te rākau a te Pākehā Hei ora mō tō tinana Pursue the essence of Sir Āpirana Ngata’s quote Put your hand to the pen As a means to well being This epigraph was given to our first-year writing course as part of a curriculum development process, and begins our course guide, welcoming students and establishing a bicultural foundation to the course – as does the course title, Tū Kupu: Writing and Inquiry. For students and teachers of writing, and for me writing now, it’s a challenge: to come to wellbeing, and to cross worlds, is to ask much of writing. It’s an evocation, not of a static form but an act – and the conviction or bravery needed to reach out to write.
这篇文章概述了新西兰奥特罗阿大学一年级的写作课程,tki - Kupu:写作与探究,这是文学学士(BA)核心课程的一部分,以“公民身份”为关键主题。我将这门课程置于新西兰奥特罗阿高等教育的背景下,以及这里教学的社会和政治背景下,分析这些背景如何深刻地影响我们在写作教学中所涉及的“公民”意识。特别是,我解释了高等教育中的新自由主义趋势和公民身份的复杂性,包括当我们将公民身份命名为教学重点时,我们所援引的多种有时是相互竞争的归属、参与和公众,以及写作在其制定中的作用。我最广泛的观点是,这一系列的复杂性对于阐明这个国家写作教学的多方面工作是有用的。此外,在三个部分中,本文通过对写作教学的一些制度和政策要求,我们可能参与的公民身份的竞争描述,以及我们的作业,文本选择和研讨会教学法如何在探究和集体方面塑造公民参与和框架写作,在归属的框架和层次变化中,以及关于大学角色的问题。Whāia nei te ia o te kupu我whakatauākīhia e TāĀpirana Ngata Ko Tōringa Ko te rā滘te Pākehā黑奥拉T mōōtinana追求的本质先生Āpirana Ngata引用把手的笔来幸福这个题词,我们给一年级写作课程作为课程开发过程的一部分,并开始我们的课程指导,欢迎学生和建立二元文化的基础这门课——课程标题一样,Tūkupu:写作和调查。对于写作的学生和老师,以及现在写作的我来说,这是一个挑战:达到幸福,跨越世界,对写作提出了很高的要求。这是一种召唤,不是静态的形式,而是一种行为——以及伸手去写所需要的信念或勇气。