A comparison of mechanisms for integrating handwritten and generated code for object-oriented programming languages

Timo Greifenberg, Katrin Hölldobler, Carsten Kolassa, M. Look, P. Nazari, Klaus Müller, A. Pérez, D. Plotnikov, D. Reiss, Alexander Roth, Bernhard Rumpe, Martin Schindler, A. Wortmann
{"title":"A comparison of mechanisms for integrating handwritten and generated code for object-oriented programming languages","authors":"Timo Greifenberg, Katrin Hölldobler, Carsten Kolassa, M. Look, P. Nazari, Klaus Müller, A. Pérez, D. Plotnikov, D. Reiss, Alexander Roth, Bernhard Rumpe, Martin Schindler, A. Wortmann","doi":"10.5220/0005239700740085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code generation from models is a core activity in model-driven development (MDD). For complex systems it is usually impossible to generate the entire software system from models alone. Thus, MDD requires mechanisms for integrating generated and handwritten code. Applying such mechanisms without considering their effects can cause issues in projects with many model and code artifacts, where a sound integration for generated and handwritten code is necessary. We provide an overview of mechanisms for integrating generated and handwritten code for object-oriented languages. In addition to that, we define and apply criteria to compare these mechanisms. The results are intended to help MDD tool developers in choosing an appropriate integration mechanism.","PeriodicalId":256976,"journal":{"name":"2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005239700740085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Code generation from models is a core activity in model-driven development (MDD). For complex systems it is usually impossible to generate the entire software system from models alone. Thus, MDD requires mechanisms for integrating generated and handwritten code. Applying such mechanisms without considering their effects can cause issues in projects with many model and code artifacts, where a sound integration for generated and handwritten code is necessary. We provide an overview of mechanisms for integrating generated and handwritten code for object-oriented languages. In addition to that, we define and apply criteria to compare these mechanisms. The results are intended to help MDD tool developers in choosing an appropriate integration mechanism.
面向对象编程语言中集成手写代码和生成代码的机制比较
从模型生成代码是模型驱动开发(MDD)中的核心活动。对于复杂的系统,通常不可能仅从模型中生成整个软件系统。因此,MDD需要集成生成代码和手写代码的机制。在不考虑其影响的情况下应用这种机制可能会在具有许多模型和代码工件的项目中导致问题,在这些项目中,生成和手写代码的良好集成是必要的。我们概述了面向对象语言集成生成代码和手写代码的机制。除此之外,我们定义并应用标准来比较这些机制。结果旨在帮助MDD工具开发人员选择适当的集成机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信