Ranking Iranian Provinces in Terms of Access to Healthcare Indicators with Emphasis on Yazd Province

Habib Ansari Samani, Donya Shajirat, Nooshin Yoshany
{"title":"Ranking Iranian Provinces in Terms of Access to Healthcare Indicators with Emphasis on Yazd Province","authors":"Habib Ansari Samani, Donya Shajirat, Nooshin Yoshany","doi":"10.18502/mshsj.v7i3.11394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ranking provinces in terms of access to healthcare services facilitates a more accurate planning in order to identify the potential and weaknesses and fair allocation of the budgets of the Ministry of Health. Therefore, the present study is carried out with the aim of ranking the provinces of the country and also investigating the position of Yazd province in terms of access to the indicators of the health sector. Methods: In terms of purpose, the present study is considered to be of an applied type with a survey-descriptive nature, and cross-sectional, in terms of time. The statistical population included all provinces of Yazd. The data which is required to access indicators of the health and treatment sector were extracted based on the information of the country's statistical yearbook in 2018. Shannon and TOPSIS entropy method and Excel 2016 and TOPSIS 2016 software were used to perform the analysis. Results: Entropy weighting method showed that medical diagnosis laboratory and genetic index had the highest weight and rehabilitation centers had the lowest weight.TOPSIS ranking method showed that regarding access to healthcare indicators, Yazd province was in the fourth place, and South Khorasan, and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces were in the first and second places. West Azarbaijan province came in last place. Conclusion: Laboratory indicators of medical diagnosis and genetics, pharmacists, general practitioners, emergency centers and beds in medical institutions respectively have the highest weights and effects in the ranking of provinces from regarding access to health and treatment indicators. Therefore, it is suggested to the planners and officials of the health and treatment sector to determine the priorities according to the extent the provinces benefit the mentioned indicators. This is done in order to increase ranking and reduce the inequalities. In order to reduce imbalance, health policymakers and officials are recommended to consider the developmental rankings of the provinces while allocating resources.","PeriodicalId":324632,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v7i3.11394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ranking provinces in terms of access to healthcare services facilitates a more accurate planning in order to identify the potential and weaknesses and fair allocation of the budgets of the Ministry of Health. Therefore, the present study is carried out with the aim of ranking the provinces of the country and also investigating the position of Yazd province in terms of access to the indicators of the health sector. Methods: In terms of purpose, the present study is considered to be of an applied type with a survey-descriptive nature, and cross-sectional, in terms of time. The statistical population included all provinces of Yazd. The data which is required to access indicators of the health and treatment sector were extracted based on the information of the country's statistical yearbook in 2018. Shannon and TOPSIS entropy method and Excel 2016 and TOPSIS 2016 software were used to perform the analysis. Results: Entropy weighting method showed that medical diagnosis laboratory and genetic index had the highest weight and rehabilitation centers had the lowest weight.TOPSIS ranking method showed that regarding access to healthcare indicators, Yazd province was in the fourth place, and South Khorasan, and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces were in the first and second places. West Azarbaijan province came in last place. Conclusion: Laboratory indicators of medical diagnosis and genetics, pharmacists, general practitioners, emergency centers and beds in medical institutions respectively have the highest weights and effects in the ranking of provinces from regarding access to health and treatment indicators. Therefore, it is suggested to the planners and officials of the health and treatment sector to determine the priorities according to the extent the provinces benefit the mentioned indicators. This is done in order to increase ranking and reduce the inequalities. In order to reduce imbalance, health policymakers and officials are recommended to consider the developmental rankings of the provinces while allocating resources.
根据获得医疗保健指标对伊朗各省进行排名,重点是亚兹德省
背景:根据获得保健服务的机会对各省进行排名,有助于更准确地进行规划,以确定潜力和弱点,并公平分配卫生部的预算。因此,开展本研究的目的是对我国各省进行排名,并调查亚兹德省在获得卫生部门指标方面的地位。方法:就目的而言,本研究被认为是一种具有调查描述性质的应用类型,并且在时间方面具有横断面性。统计人口包括亚兹德所有省份。获取卫生和治疗部门指标所需的数据是根据2018年国家统计年鉴的信息提取的。采用Shannon和TOPSIS熵法,采用Excel 2016和TOPSIS 2016软件进行分析。结果:熵权法显示医学诊断实验室和遗传指标权重最高,康复中心权重最低。TOPSIS排名方法显示,在获得医疗保健指标方面,亚兹德省排名第四,南呼罗珊省、查哈尔马哈尔省和巴赫蒂亚里省分列第一和第二名。西阿塞拜疆省排在最后一名。结论:医学诊断遗传学实验室指标、药师实验室指标、全科医生实验室指标、急诊中心实验室指标和医疗机构床位实验室指标在健康和治疗可及性指标中权重最高,影响最大。因此,建议卫生和治疗部门的规划者和官员根据各省对上述指标的受益程度来确定优先事项。这样做是为了提高排名和减少不平等。为了减少不平衡,建议卫生政策制定者和官员在分配资源时考虑各省的发展排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信