Societal consequences of modern hybrid warfare: theoretical foundations and institutional dimension

A. Grytsenko, T. Burlai, O. Borzenko
{"title":"Societal consequences of modern hybrid warfare: theoretical foundations and institutional dimension","authors":"A. Grytsenko, T. Burlai, O. Borzenko","doi":"10.15407/etet2023.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the concept of societal in the political-economic discourse, and shows its connection with the relevant philosophical and sociological vision. It is argued that the current Russian-Ukrainian war has clear signs of a modern hybrid war, which is generated by the global-local hybrid system of \"peace – war\" and combines a whole range of means, from military-political and economic to cybernetic and cultural and humanitarian ones. Based on the combination of political-economic and sociological discourses in a broad sense, it is substantiated that the main components of the hybrid system \"peace – war\" from the point of view of the transformation of social relations are: armed-military, financial-economic, and informational-spiritual components, which cause a comprehensive impact on people’s worldview, positioning and behavior, which leads to significant societal consequences. The authors give various characteristics of the institutional dimension of the war’s societal consequences. Theoretically, the phenomenon of emergent institutional order is taken as the basis for considering the institutional dimension of the societal consequences caused by the hybrid war. It is revealed that in the martial law conditions, the role of the trust institution is growing (the trust institution is considered as a defining and integral construct of the socio-economic system’s institutional architecture, embodied both in trust in the state and power structures, and in trust in new institutions created by the hybrid war (volunteers and various forms of amateur civil movements)). The authors show that in the context of societal development in the conditions of war shocks and post-war recovery of Ukraine, the quality of institutions and the state’s institutional potential play an extremely important role. Analysis of the societal consequences of the Russian Federation’s invasion in Ukraine in the institutional dimension shows the need to overcome the key institutional destructions generated both in the previous period and during the war. Also, it is necessary to create an institutional basis for a new economic model focused on ensuring a combination of Ukrainian effective reconstructive recovery in the post-war period and its full integration into the European Union and the world space.","PeriodicalId":209799,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2023.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reveals the concept of societal in the political-economic discourse, and shows its connection with the relevant philosophical and sociological vision. It is argued that the current Russian-Ukrainian war has clear signs of a modern hybrid war, which is generated by the global-local hybrid system of "peace – war" and combines a whole range of means, from military-political and economic to cybernetic and cultural and humanitarian ones. Based on the combination of political-economic and sociological discourses in a broad sense, it is substantiated that the main components of the hybrid system "peace – war" from the point of view of the transformation of social relations are: armed-military, financial-economic, and informational-spiritual components, which cause a comprehensive impact on people’s worldview, positioning and behavior, which leads to significant societal consequences. The authors give various characteristics of the institutional dimension of the war’s societal consequences. Theoretically, the phenomenon of emergent institutional order is taken as the basis for considering the institutional dimension of the societal consequences caused by the hybrid war. It is revealed that in the martial law conditions, the role of the trust institution is growing (the trust institution is considered as a defining and integral construct of the socio-economic system’s institutional architecture, embodied both in trust in the state and power structures, and in trust in new institutions created by the hybrid war (volunteers and various forms of amateur civil movements)). The authors show that in the context of societal development in the conditions of war shocks and post-war recovery of Ukraine, the quality of institutions and the state’s institutional potential play an extremely important role. Analysis of the societal consequences of the Russian Federation’s invasion in Ukraine in the institutional dimension shows the need to overcome the key institutional destructions generated both in the previous period and during the war. Also, it is necessary to create an institutional basis for a new economic model focused on ensuring a combination of Ukrainian effective reconstructive recovery in the post-war period and its full integration into the European Union and the world space.
现代混合战争的社会后果:理论基础和制度维度
本文揭示了政治经济话语中的社会概念,并指出了它与相关的哲学和社会学视野的联系。本文认为,当前的俄乌战争具有明显的现代混合战争特征,它是由“和平-战争”的全球-地方混合系统产生的,并结合了从军事-政治和经济到控制论和文化和人道主义的一系列手段。基于广义的政治-经济与社会学话语的结合,从社会关系转化的角度证实了“和平-战争”混合系统的主要组成部分是:武装-军事、金融-经济和信息-精神组成部分,这些组成部分对人们的世界观、定位和行为产生了全面的影响,并导致了重大的社会后果。作者给出了战争社会后果的制度维度的各种特征。从理论上讲,将新兴制度秩序现象作为考虑混合战争社会后果的制度维度的基础。研究发现,在戒严令条件下,信托机构的作用越来越大(信托机构被认为是社会经济系统制度架构的一个决定性和整体结构,既体现在对国家和权力结构的信任,也体现在对混合战争(志愿者和各种形式的业余公民运动)所创建的新机构的信任)。作者表明,在乌克兰战争冲击和战后恢复条件下的社会发展背景下,制度质量和国家制度潜力发挥着极其重要的作用。对俄罗斯联邦入侵乌克兰的社会后果在体制方面的分析表明,有必要克服在前一时期和战争期间造成的主要体制破坏。此外,有必要为一种新的经济模式创造体制基础,其重点是确保乌克兰在战后时期的有效重建恢复与充分融入欧洲联盟和世界空间相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信