Racial Politics and Hausa-Fulani Dominant Identity in Colonial and Post-colonial Northern Nigeria

E. Ugbem, A. O. Omobowale, Olanrewaju Olutayo Akinpelu
{"title":"Racial Politics and Hausa-Fulani Dominant Identity in Colonial and Post-colonial Northern Nigeria","authors":"E. Ugbem, A. O. Omobowale, Olanrewaju Olutayo Akinpelu","doi":"10.36108/njsa/9102/71(0160)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examined racial politics and identity contests in Northern Nigeria. The paper specifically traced the trajectory of racial politics and examined the dynamics of identity construction and contests in Northern Nigeria. An essentially qualitative method of data collection comprising primary data generated through in-depth interviews and secondary data generated through archival records were used. These were then subjected to content and descriptive analyses. Findings from the study revealed that racial politics originated during colonial rule with the British supposedly claiming gene/biological affinity of the Hausa-Fulani as with the Caucasoid groups of Eurasia. The Hausa-Fulani were consequently designated as the civilized group and super-imposed over minority groups that were classified as pagans. About six decades after colonial rule, Hausa-Fulani dominance remains a social reality in spite of identity contests and recreation by the minority groups of Northern Nigeria. Starting with the creation of the Middle Belt identity in the late 1950s, the constituent groups within the Middle Belt have consequently recreated other ethnic identities within Northern Nigeria. Notwithstanding, Hausa-Fulani remains the dominant group in Northern Nigeria socio-political structure.","PeriodicalId":265152,"journal":{"name":"The Nigerian Journal of Sociology and Anthropology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nigerian Journal of Sociology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/njsa/9102/71(0160)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examined racial politics and identity contests in Northern Nigeria. The paper specifically traced the trajectory of racial politics and examined the dynamics of identity construction and contests in Northern Nigeria. An essentially qualitative method of data collection comprising primary data generated through in-depth interviews and secondary data generated through archival records were used. These were then subjected to content and descriptive analyses. Findings from the study revealed that racial politics originated during colonial rule with the British supposedly claiming gene/biological affinity of the Hausa-Fulani as with the Caucasoid groups of Eurasia. The Hausa-Fulani were consequently designated as the civilized group and super-imposed over minority groups that were classified as pagans. About six decades after colonial rule, Hausa-Fulani dominance remains a social reality in spite of identity contests and recreation by the minority groups of Northern Nigeria. Starting with the creation of the Middle Belt identity in the late 1950s, the constituent groups within the Middle Belt have consequently recreated other ethnic identities within Northern Nigeria. Notwithstanding, Hausa-Fulani remains the dominant group in Northern Nigeria socio-political structure.
种族政治和豪萨-富拉尼在殖民和后殖民尼日利亚北部的主导身份
这篇论文研究了尼日利亚北部的种族政治和身份争夺。这篇论文特别追溯了种族政治的轨迹,并研究了尼日利亚北部身份建构和竞争的动态。采用本质上定性的数据收集方法,包括通过深入访谈产生的主要数据和通过档案记录产生的次要数据。然后进行内容分析和描述性分析。研究结果显示,种族政治起源于殖民统治时期,英国人声称豪萨-富拉尼人的基因/生物亲和性与欧亚大陆的高加索人相似。因此,豪萨-富拉尼人被指定为文明群体,凌驾于被归类为异教徒的少数群体之上。在殖民统治大约60年后,豪萨-富拉尼人的统治地位仍然是一个社会现实,尽管尼日利亚北部的少数群体存在身份争夺和娱乐活动。从20世纪50年代后期建立中间地带身份开始,中间地带内的组成团体因此在尼日利亚北部重建了其他种族身份。尽管如此,豪萨-富拉尼人仍然是尼日利亚北部社会政治结构中的主导群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信