Using dual approximation algorithms for scheduling problems: Theoretical and practical results

D. Hochbaum, D. Shmoys
{"title":"Using dual approximation algorithms for scheduling problems: Theoretical and practical results","authors":"D. Hochbaum, D. Shmoys","doi":"10.1145/7531.7535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of scheduling a set of n jobs on m identical machines so as to minimize the makespan time is perhaps the most well-studied problem in the theory of approximation algorithms for NP-hard optimization problems. In this paper we present the strongest possible type of result for this problem, a polynomial approximation scheme. More precisely, for each ε, we give an algorithm that runs in time O((n/ε)1/ε2) and has relative error at most ε. For algorithms that are polynomial in n and m, the strongest previously-known result was that the MULTIFIT algorithm delivers a solution with no worse than 20% relative error. In addition, we present a refinement of our scheme in the case where the performance guarantee is equal to that of MUL-TIFIT, that yields an algorithm that is both more efficient and easier to analyze than MULTIFIT. In this case, in order to guarantee a maximum relative error of 1/5+2-k, the algorithm runs in O(n(k+logn)) time. The scheme is based on a new approach to constructing approximation algorithms, which we call dual approximation algorithms, where the aim is find superoptimal, but infeasible solutions, and the performance is measured by the degree of infeasibility allowed. This notion should find wide applicability in its own right, and should be considered for any optimization problem where traditional approximation algorithms have been particularly elusive.","PeriodicalId":296739,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"720","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/7531.7535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 720

Abstract

The problem of scheduling a set of n jobs on m identical machines so as to minimize the makespan time is perhaps the most well-studied problem in the theory of approximation algorithms for NP-hard optimization problems. In this paper we present the strongest possible type of result for this problem, a polynomial approximation scheme. More precisely, for each ε, we give an algorithm that runs in time O((n/ε)1/ε2) and has relative error at most ε. For algorithms that are polynomial in n and m, the strongest previously-known result was that the MULTIFIT algorithm delivers a solution with no worse than 20% relative error. In addition, we present a refinement of our scheme in the case where the performance guarantee is equal to that of MUL-TIFIT, that yields an algorithm that is both more efficient and easier to analyze than MULTIFIT. In this case, in order to guarantee a maximum relative error of 1/5+2-k, the algorithm runs in O(n(k+logn)) time. The scheme is based on a new approach to constructing approximation algorithms, which we call dual approximation algorithms, where the aim is find superoptimal, but infeasible solutions, and the performance is measured by the degree of infeasibility allowed. This notion should find wide applicability in its own right, and should be considered for any optimization problem where traditional approximation algorithms have been particularly elusive.
用对偶逼近算法求解调度问题:理论与实践结果
调度m台相同机器上的一组n个作业以使最大完工时间最小化的问题可能是NP-hard优化问题的近似算法理论中研究得最多的问题。在本文中,我们给出了这个问题的最强可能类型的结果,一个多项式近似格式。更准确地说,对于每个ε,我们给出了一个运行时间为O((n/ε)1/ε2)且相对误差不超过ε的算法。对于n和m为多项式的算法,先前已知的最强结果是MULTIFIT算法提供的解决方案的相对误差不小于20%。此外,在性能保证与multi - tifit相同的情况下,我们对方案进行了改进,从而产生了比MULTIFIT更有效且更易于分析的算法。在本例中,为了保证最大相对误差为1/5+2-k,算法运行时间为O(n(k+logn))。该方案基于一种构造近似算法的新方法,我们称之为对偶近似算法,其目标是找到超优但不可行的解,并通过允许的不可行程度来衡量性能。这个概念应该在它自己的权利中找到广泛的适用性,并且应该考虑任何传统近似算法特别难以捉摸的优化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信