Treatment of Uncertainties in Probabilistic Risk Assessment

V. D. Vasconcelos, W. A. Soares, Antônio Carlos Lopes da Costa, A. Raso
{"title":"Treatment of Uncertainties in Probabilistic Risk Assessment","authors":"V. D. Vasconcelos, W. A. Soares, Antônio Carlos Lopes da Costa, A. Raso","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.83541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), sometimes called probabilistic safety analysis, quantifies the risk of undesired events in industrial facilities. However, one of the weaknesses that undermines the credibility and usefulness of this technique is the uncertainty in PRA results. Fault tree analysis (FTA) and event tree analysis (ETA) are the most important PRA techniques for evaluating system reliabilities and likelihoods of accident scenarios. Uncertainties, as incompleteness and imprecision, are present in probabilities of undesired events and failure rate data. Fur-thermore, both FTA and ETA traditionally assume that events are independent, assumptions that are often unrealistic and introduce uncertainties in data and modeling when using FTA and ETA. This work explores uncertainty handling approaches for analyzing the fault trees and event trees (method of moments) as a way to overcome the challenges of PRA. Applications of the developed frameworks and approaches are explored in illustrative examples, where the probability distributions of the top event of fault trees are obtained through the propagation of uncertainties of the failure probabilities of basic events. The application of the method of moments to propagate uncertainty of log-normal distributions showed good agreement with results available in the literature using different methods.","PeriodicalId":357808,"journal":{"name":"Reliability and Maintenance - An Overview of Cases","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability and Maintenance - An Overview of Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.83541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), sometimes called probabilistic safety analysis, quantifies the risk of undesired events in industrial facilities. However, one of the weaknesses that undermines the credibility and usefulness of this technique is the uncertainty in PRA results. Fault tree analysis (FTA) and event tree analysis (ETA) are the most important PRA techniques for evaluating system reliabilities and likelihoods of accident scenarios. Uncertainties, as incompleteness and imprecision, are present in probabilities of undesired events and failure rate data. Fur-thermore, both FTA and ETA traditionally assume that events are independent, assumptions that are often unrealistic and introduce uncertainties in data and modeling when using FTA and ETA. This work explores uncertainty handling approaches for analyzing the fault trees and event trees (method of moments) as a way to overcome the challenges of PRA. Applications of the developed frameworks and approaches are explored in illustrative examples, where the probability distributions of the top event of fault trees are obtained through the propagation of uncertainties of the failure probabilities of basic events. The application of the method of moments to propagate uncertainty of log-normal distributions showed good agreement with results available in the literature using different methods.
概率风险评估中不确定性的处理
概率风险评估(PRA),有时被称为概率安全分析,量化工业设施中意外事件的风险。然而,削弱该技术可信度和实用性的弱点之一是PRA结果的不确定性。故障树分析(FTA)和事件树分析(ETA)是评估系统可靠性和事故场景可能性的最重要的PRA技术。不确定性,如不完整和不精确,存在于不期望事件的概率和故障率数据中。此外,FTA和ETA传统上都假设事件是独立的,这些假设往往是不现实的,并且在使用FTA和ETA时在数据和建模中引入了不确定性。本文探讨了故障树和事件树(矩量法)的不确定性处理方法,以克服PRA的挑战。通过实例研究了所开发的框架和方法的应用,通过传播基本事件的失效概率的不确定性,得到了故障树的顶事件的概率分布。应用矩量法传播对数正态分布的不确定性,与文献中使用不同方法得到的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信