Comparative studies of hyperbolic sine constitutive models for constant pressure superplastic tests

L. García-Barrachina, Antonio J. Gámez
{"title":"Comparative studies of hyperbolic sine constitutive models for constant pressure superplastic tests","authors":"L. García-Barrachina, Antonio J. Gámez","doi":"10.21741/9781644902615-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The constant pressure free-inflation test is a very versatile and simple tool for analyzing different features of superplastic forming. In recent years, different methods have been proposed to measure constitutive parameters of the stress–strain relationship for the superplastic material, specifically the K and m parameters of the power law model. However, this law is restricted to be used in narrow strain-rate ranges, and poor results are obtained when applied in a broader spectrum. To overcome this problem, numerous constitutive models covering the full strain-rate range applicable in superplastic forming have been proposed historically, including the hyperbolic sine equation. However, there is no clear consensus on the type of hyperbolic sine function to use. Some authors include a sensitivity parameter while others do not. This article aims to study the characteristics of the hyperbolic sine constitutive model, checking which of the historically proposed models achieves better results in the test at free deformation and constant pressure.","PeriodicalId":242571,"journal":{"name":"Superplasticity in Advanced Materials","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Superplasticity in Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644902615-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The constant pressure free-inflation test is a very versatile and simple tool for analyzing different features of superplastic forming. In recent years, different methods have been proposed to measure constitutive parameters of the stress–strain relationship for the superplastic material, specifically the K and m parameters of the power law model. However, this law is restricted to be used in narrow strain-rate ranges, and poor results are obtained when applied in a broader spectrum. To overcome this problem, numerous constitutive models covering the full strain-rate range applicable in superplastic forming have been proposed historically, including the hyperbolic sine equation. However, there is no clear consensus on the type of hyperbolic sine function to use. Some authors include a sensitivity parameter while others do not. This article aims to study the characteristics of the hyperbolic sine constitutive model, checking which of the historically proposed models achieves better results in the test at free deformation and constant pressure.
恒压超塑性试验双曲正弦本构模型的比较研究
摘要恒压无膨胀试验是分析超塑性成形各种特征的一种通用而简便的工具。近年来,人们提出了不同的方法来测量超塑性材料的应力应变关系的本构参数,特别是幂律模型的K和m参数。然而,该定律仅限于在较窄的应变速率范围内使用,而在较宽的范围内应用时,结果较差。为了克服这一问题,历史上已经提出了许多涵盖适用于超塑性成形的全应变率范围的本构模型,包括双曲正弦方程。然而,对于使用哪种双曲正弦函数并没有明确的共识。一些作者包括了一个灵敏度参数,而另一些作者则没有。本文旨在研究双曲正弦本构模型的特性,检验历史上提出的模型中哪一种在自由变形和恒压下的试验中效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信