The Conflict Between Economic and Social Preferences: Social Investing, Social Enterprise, Mind-Sets and Nudges

N. Hinvest, Richard J. Fairchild, Habiba Elkholy
{"title":"The Conflict Between Economic and Social Preferences: Social Investing, Social Enterprise, Mind-Sets and Nudges","authors":"N. Hinvest, Richard J. Fairchild, Habiba Elkholy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3135226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b). Can investors be nudged along this continuum? We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.","PeriodicalId":224430,"journal":{"name":"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b). Can investors be nudged along this continuum? We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.
经济偏好和社会偏好之间的冲突:社会投资、社会企业、思维模式和推动
近年来,投资金融市场变得越来越复杂,投资产品和动机多种多样。随着社会投资和社会企业家精神的快速发展,学者们认识到,投资者和企业家在做出财务决策时,除了考虑财务回报外,还经常考虑广泛的社会因素。行为经济学家认为,理解影响社会投资者决策的复杂经济和行为/心理因素是很重要的。在本文中,我们借鉴了行为经济学(特别是社会偏好理论)的经验教训,以便对投资者的社会和金融思维模式进行神经经济学测试。我们专注于两个主要的研究问题:a)(社会)投资者在财务和社会回报上的无意识权重有多高?投资者的思维模式能否被置于一个连续体上,从关注社会回报,到混合动机/权重,再到关注财务回报?b)投资者能被推动沿着这个连续体前进吗?我们通过两个神经实验来解决这两个研究问题。我们采用眼球追踪技术来检查投资者对金融市场投资的社会和金融方面的关注和关注。此外,我们还使用与积极和消极的社会行为有关的图像的形式来推动。我们的实验表明,a)投资者确实可以被置于金融-社会动机连续体上(并且社会投资者的动机在这个尺度上存在异质性),b)投资者可以被推到这个尺度上。因此,我们的实验提供了推动社会投资的政策含义。实际上,我们建议开发一款手机应用程序,将实时股票跟踪与推文相结合,以激励社会责任投资;银行将在鼓励下载方面发挥关键作用。轻推有助于克服社会回报和经济回报之间的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信