Thinking Transindividuality along the Spinoza-Marx Encounter: A Conversation

Bram Wiggers, J. Read
{"title":"Thinking Transindividuality along the Spinoza-Marx Encounter: A Conversation","authors":"Bram Wiggers, J. Read","doi":"10.21827/krisis.42.1.38348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the publication of Read’s The Politics of Transindividuality (2015), the academic interest in transindividuality has steadily mounted. In this conversation, Bram Wiggers and Jason Read discuss the current state of affairs around the concept of transindividuality. The conversation begins with a definition of transindividuality and discusses what sets the term apart from other philosophies of social individuation. Having defined the concept of transindividuality, the conversation then engages with the question of how transindividuality can be adopted as a means of social-political critique. First, Bram and Jason discuss how transindividuality is evoked but not explicitly mentioned in the social-political critiques of Spinoza and Marx. Secondly, the conversation takes up the social-political critiques of Paolo Virno and Bernard Stiegler who make explicit use of transindividuality. Central to the later parts of the conversation is the complicated interrelation between the political and economic domains of individuation, as well as the tendency of collective modes of representation to be effaced and obscured by (neoliberal) individualism and the post-Fordist conditions of labor. Overall, the conversation highlights the relevance of transindividuality for social-political philosophical critique.","PeriodicalId":290939,"journal":{"name":"Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.42.1.38348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ever since the publication of Read’s The Politics of Transindividuality (2015), the academic interest in transindividuality has steadily mounted. In this conversation, Bram Wiggers and Jason Read discuss the current state of affairs around the concept of transindividuality. The conversation begins with a definition of transindividuality and discusses what sets the term apart from other philosophies of social individuation. Having defined the concept of transindividuality, the conversation then engages with the question of how transindividuality can be adopted as a means of social-political critique. First, Bram and Jason discuss how transindividuality is evoked but not explicitly mentioned in the social-political critiques of Spinoza and Marx. Secondly, the conversation takes up the social-political critiques of Paolo Virno and Bernard Stiegler who make explicit use of transindividuality. Central to the later parts of the conversation is the complicated interrelation between the political and economic domains of individuation, as well as the tendency of collective modes of representation to be effaced and obscured by (neoliberal) individualism and the post-Fordist conditions of labor. Overall, the conversation highlights the relevance of transindividuality for social-political philosophical critique.
从斯宾诺莎-马克思相遇的角度思考超越个性:一次对话
自从Read的《跨个性的政治》(2015)出版以来,学术界对跨个性的兴趣稳步上升。在这段对话中,Bram Wiggers和Jason Read讨论了关于跨个性概念的现状。对话从跨个性的定义开始,并讨论是什么将这个术语与其他社会个性化哲学区分开来。在定义了跨个性的概念之后,接下来的对话涉及到如何将跨个性作为一种社会政治批判手段的问题。首先,Bram和Jason讨论了超越个性是如何被唤起的,但在斯宾诺莎和马克思的社会政治批判中没有明确提到。其次,对话涉及到保罗·维尔诺和伯纳德·斯蒂格勒的社会政治批判,他们明确地使用了跨个性。对话后面部分的核心是个性化的政治和经济领域之间复杂的相互关系,以及集体代表模式被(新自由主义的)个人主义和后福特主义的劳动条件所淡化和模糊的趋势。总的来说,对话强调了跨个性与社会政治哲学批判的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信