The Decline of Trust in Government

Geoffrey A. Hosking
{"title":"The Decline of Trust in Government","authors":"Geoffrey A. Hosking","doi":"10.1163/9789004390430_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observers’ surprise at the recent rise of populist parties in many European countries, the triumph of Brexit in the UK referendum of June 2016 and the election of Donald Trump to the US Presidency in November 2016 has shown how poorly questions of generalised social trust are understood by most political commentators and social scientists. The best explanation for these epochal events is a sharp decline in public trust. The Edelman Trust Barometer records this decline in recent years. It is a worldwide poll, but its figures show European countries and the usa as being among the worst affected, with half or more of their populations believing the present system is not working. The Edelman figures suggest that public trust in government, business, the public media and ngos are all falling, trust in the Chief Executive Officers of large businesses especially sharply. The result is a rising sense of injustice and helplessness, a lack of hope and confidence in the present system, and a desire for radical change. All of these features help to explain the public’s loss of faith in established parties of government and opposition and its growing attachment to populist parties which offer faith in ordinary people and simple solutions to complex problems.1 In order to understand what is going on, then, it is crucial that we study generalised social trust systematically. I offered a framework for doing so in my Trust: a History (Oxford University Press, 2014), and I also suggested why social distrust is growing within modern Western societies. In this paper I take that account further, up to the critical votes and decisions of 2015–16. Trust is a universal human need. We all need to take decisions every day about how to behave in certain situations. Most of those decisions concern the future in some way. We are virtually never in a position to know and weigh rationally all the factors affecting any given decision; instead we have to trust certain constants in our life, and decide according to habit, feeling and personal taste. The trust involved here can always be traced back to general social trust. Individual trust is always placed within a framework of broader trust vectors within society. The guarantees of our trust are cultural and social entities:","PeriodicalId":140910,"journal":{"name":"Trust in Contemporary Society","volume":"363 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trust in Contemporary Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390430_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Observers’ surprise at the recent rise of populist parties in many European countries, the triumph of Brexit in the UK referendum of June 2016 and the election of Donald Trump to the US Presidency in November 2016 has shown how poorly questions of generalised social trust are understood by most political commentators and social scientists. The best explanation for these epochal events is a sharp decline in public trust. The Edelman Trust Barometer records this decline in recent years. It is a worldwide poll, but its figures show European countries and the usa as being among the worst affected, with half or more of their populations believing the present system is not working. The Edelman figures suggest that public trust in government, business, the public media and ngos are all falling, trust in the Chief Executive Officers of large businesses especially sharply. The result is a rising sense of injustice and helplessness, a lack of hope and confidence in the present system, and a desire for radical change. All of these features help to explain the public’s loss of faith in established parties of government and opposition and its growing attachment to populist parties which offer faith in ordinary people and simple solutions to complex problems.1 In order to understand what is going on, then, it is crucial that we study generalised social trust systematically. I offered a framework for doing so in my Trust: a History (Oxford University Press, 2014), and I also suggested why social distrust is growing within modern Western societies. In this paper I take that account further, up to the critical votes and decisions of 2015–16. Trust is a universal human need. We all need to take decisions every day about how to behave in certain situations. Most of those decisions concern the future in some way. We are virtually never in a position to know and weigh rationally all the factors affecting any given decision; instead we have to trust certain constants in our life, and decide according to habit, feeling and personal taste. The trust involved here can always be traced back to general social trust. Individual trust is always placed within a framework of broader trust vectors within society. The guarantees of our trust are cultural and social entities:
对政府信任度的下降
观察人士对最近许多欧洲国家民粹主义政党的崛起、2016年6月英国脱欧公投的胜利以及唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)在2016年11月当选美国总统感到惊讶,这表明大多数政治评论员和社会科学家对普遍社会信任问题的理解有多么糟糕。对这些划时代事件的最好解释是公众信任度的急剧下降。爱德曼信托晴雨表(Edelman Trust Barometer)记录了近年来的这种下降。这是一项全球性的民意调查,但其数据显示,欧洲国家和美国是受影响最严重的国家之一,一半或更多的人认为目前的制度不起作用。爱德曼的数据显示,公众对政府、企业、公共媒体和非政府组织的信任度都在下降,对大型企业首席执行官的信任度尤其严重。其结果是,不公正和无助感日益增强,对现行制度缺乏希望和信心,渴望彻底变革。所有这些特点都有助于解释为什么公众对既有的政府和反对党失去了信心,而对民粹主义政党越来越有好感,因为民粹主义政党提供了对普通人的信任和对复杂问题的简单解决方案因此,为了理解发生了什么,我们有必要系统地研究广义社会信任。我在我的《信任:历史》(牛津大学出版社,2014年)中提供了这样做的框架,我还提出了为什么现代西方社会中社会不信任正在增长。在本文中,我进一步考虑到2015-16年的关键投票和决定。信任是人类的普遍需求。我们每天都需要决定在某些情况下如何表现。这些决定大多在某种程度上关系到未来。实际上,我们永远无法理性地了解和权衡影响任何给定决策的所有因素;相反,我们必须相信生活中的某些常量,并根据习惯、感觉和个人品味做出决定。这里所涉及的信任总是可以追溯到一般的社会信任。个人信任总是置于社会中更广泛的信任载体的框架内。我们信任的保障是文化和社会实体:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信