An Empirical Analysis of Credit Risk Based on NonPerforming Assets of Selected Banking Sectors of India: Data Validation by Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Ankur Joshi, N. V. Rao
{"title":"An Empirical Analysis of Credit Risk Based on NonPerforming Assets of Selected Banking Sectors of India: Data Validation by Using Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Ankur Joshi, N. V. Rao","doi":"10.46338/ijetae0523_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was an attempt to study the impact of nonperforming assets (NPAs) in the selected public and private banking sectors from 2008 to 2019. An empirical study wasvalidatedby using machine learning (ML) algorithm models (Python via Jupiter Notebook, version 3.6) to know the credit risk. It was predicted the overall credit risk as per cut off GNPA>6, and GNPA>7through two types of models such as Regression and Classification models. In empirical findings, highly significant (p<0.001) change between studied banks as well as yearly data and GNPA & NNPA was recorded. Moreover,highly significant (p<0.001) differences were noted for the banking performance based on GNPA and NNPA and other macroeconomic variables viz. Unsecured/Tot Advances, GDP, CPI, Total Profit/ Total Advances, TL, GDP-1, Total Advances, RR, STA, Total Earnings/Total Advances, PSL, CPI-1.ForML study, the Naïve Bayes Classification was predicted to know how the Gross NPA is getting effected by different variables and obtained an accuracy of about 86% and the Support Vector Classification was obtained an accuracy of about 97% and about 100% for the Random Forest classifications, which seems like more realistic models.It may be varied with other independent variables like credit risk parameters and macroeconomic variables, etc. It is suggested in future to study with these cut off values for the determination of credit risk of these banking sectors. Keywords –Indian banking sectors; Machine learning algorithms; Non-performing assets; Empirical study","PeriodicalId":169403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae0523_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was an attempt to study the impact of nonperforming assets (NPAs) in the selected public and private banking sectors from 2008 to 2019. An empirical study wasvalidatedby using machine learning (ML) algorithm models (Python via Jupiter Notebook, version 3.6) to know the credit risk. It was predicted the overall credit risk as per cut off GNPA>6, and GNPA>7through two types of models such as Regression and Classification models. In empirical findings, highly significant (p<0.001) change between studied banks as well as yearly data and GNPA & NNPA was recorded. Moreover,highly significant (p<0.001) differences were noted for the banking performance based on GNPA and NNPA and other macroeconomic variables viz. Unsecured/Tot Advances, GDP, CPI, Total Profit/ Total Advances, TL, GDP-1, Total Advances, RR, STA, Total Earnings/Total Advances, PSL, CPI-1.ForML study, the Naïve Bayes Classification was predicted to know how the Gross NPA is getting effected by different variables and obtained an accuracy of about 86% and the Support Vector Classification was obtained an accuracy of about 97% and about 100% for the Random Forest classifications, which seems like more realistic models.It may be varied with other independent variables like credit risk parameters and macroeconomic variables, etc. It is suggested in future to study with these cut off values for the determination of credit risk of these banking sectors. Keywords –Indian banking sectors; Machine learning algorithms; Non-performing assets; Empirical study
基于印度银行业不良资产的信用风险实证分析:机器学习算法的数据验证
这是一项研究2008年至2019年期间选定的公共和私人银行部门不良资产(NPAs)影响的尝试。利用机器学习(ML)算法模型(Python via Jupiter Notebook, version 3.6)了解信用风险,对实证研究进行了验证。通过回归模型和分类模型两种模型,分别预测了截断GNPA>6和截断GNPA>7时的整体信用风险。在实证研究中,被研究银行之间以及年度数据与GNPA和NNPA之间的变化非常显著(p<0.001)。此外,基于GNPA和NNPA以及其他宏观经济变量,即无担保/总预支、GDP、CPI、总利润/总预支、TL、GDP-1、总预支、RR、STA、总收益/总预支、PSL、CPI-1,银行业绩存在高度显著差异(p<0.001)。在ForML研究中,Naïve贝叶斯分类被预测知道Gross NPA如何受到不同变量的影响,并获得了约86%的准确率,支持向量分类在Random Forest分类中获得了约97%和约100%的准确率,这似乎是更现实的模型。它可能与其他自变量如信用风险参数和宏观经济变量等发生变化。建议今后利用这些截断值进行研究,以确定这些银行部门的信用风险。关键词:印度银行业;机器学习算法;不良资产;实证研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信