análisis dE la fiabilidad intra-Examinador dEl método dE cinta para Evaluación dE la difErEncia dE ExtEnsión dE las ExtrEmidadEs infEriorEs

Danielle Alves Brêtas, J. Vitor, Faria Nogueira, Michelle Vieira Carneiro, Renato Aparecido de Souza, Adriano Prado Simão
{"title":"análisis dE la fiabilidad intra-Examinador dEl método dE cinta para Evaluación dE la difErEncia dE ExtEnsión dE las ExtrEmidadEs infEriorEs","authors":"Danielle Alves Brêtas, J. Vitor, Faria Nogueira, Michelle Vieira Carneiro, Renato Aparecido de Souza, Adriano Prado Simão","doi":"10.3900/FPJ.8.5.335.S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the intra-examiner reliability of the tape method (TM) measure to leg length discrepancy (LLD) on symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers, and verify if the presence of deformities in low limbs (LL), history of fracture in LL and obesity influence the level of LLD. Materials and Methods: One trained examiner performed measurements of both lower limbs in two different occasions, with an interval of 48 hours between them. The sample consisted of 37 volunteers (28 women and 9 men) characterized as follows: history of fracture of lower limbs (n=5), presence of deformities of lower limbs (n=9), obese (n=9) and asymptomatic (n=14). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s correlation (reliability of the measures) and t-test for independent samples (influence of symptoms on the level of LLD) were used. Results: While the volunteers had asymptomatic value of r=0.98, symptomatic volunteers were classified as small reliability. Furthermore, there was no difference in the level of severity of DCMI among the volunteers (p>0.05). Discussion: It was concluded that the TM measure to LLD is reliable for your application if include asymptomatic individuals.","PeriodicalId":164994,"journal":{"name":"Fitness & Performance Journal","volume":"334 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fitness & Performance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3900/FPJ.8.5.335.S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the intra-examiner reliability of the tape method (TM) measure to leg length discrepancy (LLD) on symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers, and verify if the presence of deformities in low limbs (LL), history of fracture in LL and obesity influence the level of LLD. Materials and Methods: One trained examiner performed measurements of both lower limbs in two different occasions, with an interval of 48 hours between them. The sample consisted of 37 volunteers (28 women and 9 men) characterized as follows: history of fracture of lower limbs (n=5), presence of deformities of lower limbs (n=9), obese (n=9) and asymptomatic (n=14). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s correlation (reliability of the measures) and t-test for independent samples (influence of symptoms on the level of LLD) were used. Results: While the volunteers had asymptomatic value of r=0.98, symptomatic volunteers were classified as small reliability. Furthermore, there was no difference in the level of severity of DCMI among the volunteers (p>0.05). Discussion: It was concluded that the TM measure to LLD is reliable for your application if include asymptomatic individuals.
胶带法评估下肢伸展差异的检验员内部可靠性分析
前言:本研究的目的是分析有症状和无症状志愿者的卷尺法(tape method, TM)测量腿长差异(LLD)在受试者内部的可靠性,并验证下肢畸形(LL)的存在、下肢骨折史和肥胖是否影响LLD水平。材料和方法:一名训练有素的检查员在两个不同的场合测量双下肢,间隔48小时。样本包括37名志愿者(28名女性和9名男性),其特征如下:下肢骨折史(n=5),下肢畸形存在(n=9),肥胖(n=9)和无症状(n=14)。采用类内相关系数(ICC)、Pearson相关系数(测量的信度)和独立样本t检验(症状对LLD水平的影响)。结果:无症状志愿者的r值为0.98,有症状志愿者被归为小信度。两组患者DCMI严重程度差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。讨论:结论是,如果包括无症状个体,对LLD的TM测量是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信