De glemte barna – en kartleggingsstudie av tilbud til og muligheter for pårørende søsken i norske kommuner

Yngvild Bjartveit Haukeland, Ann-Helen Kongshaug Rønning, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Torun Marie Vatne
{"title":"De glemte barna – en kartleggingsstudie av tilbud til og muligheter for pårørende søsken i norske kommuner","authors":"Yngvild Bjartveit Haukeland, Ann-Helen Kongshaug Rønning, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Torun Marie Vatne","doi":"10.52734/82j9m28u","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Norwegian health professionals are obliged to provide support to siblings as next of kin. Preliminary evidence for positive outcomes of SIBS, a novel five-session intervention for siblings as next of kin, exists. This study aimed to investigate the extent and type of sibling support in the community health services. It also aimed to examine prospective acceptability for SIBS among community health workers. Methods: We asked public health nurses, psychologists, and chief physicians in Norwegian municipalities about sibling support and about their evaluations of SIBS. We conducted descriptive analyses and a qualitative analysis guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: 332 respondents from 253 municipalities participated. Siblings were rarely systematically identified. School health services were common support providers, but mostly upon request from families. There was limited collaboration with the specialist health care or other services. Prospective acceptability for SIBS was high, but several barriers to implementation in community services were reported. Conclusion: Sibling support at the community level is deficient, and successful implementation of adequate interventions requires intralevel and interlevel collaboration. Keywords: siblings, children as next of kin, chronic disorders, disabilities, prevention, implementation","PeriodicalId":344686,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","volume":"239 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52734/82j9m28u","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Norwegian health professionals are obliged to provide support to siblings as next of kin. Preliminary evidence for positive outcomes of SIBS, a novel five-session intervention for siblings as next of kin, exists. This study aimed to investigate the extent and type of sibling support in the community health services. It also aimed to examine prospective acceptability for SIBS among community health workers. Methods: We asked public health nurses, psychologists, and chief physicians in Norwegian municipalities about sibling support and about their evaluations of SIBS. We conducted descriptive analyses and a qualitative analysis guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: 332 respondents from 253 municipalities participated. Siblings were rarely systematically identified. School health services were common support providers, but mostly upon request from families. There was limited collaboration with the specialist health care or other services. Prospective acceptability for SIBS was high, but several barriers to implementation in community services were reported. Conclusion: Sibling support at the community level is deficient, and successful implementation of adequate interventions requires intralevel and interlevel collaboration. Keywords: siblings, children as next of kin, chronic disorders, disabilities, prevention, implementation
背景:挪威卫生专业人员有义务向作为近亲的兄弟姐妹提供支持。初步证据表明,SIBS是一种新型的五期干预,以兄弟姐妹为近亲。本研究旨在调查社区卫生服务中兄弟姐妹支持的程度和类型。它还旨在审查社区卫生工作者对SIBS的未来可接受性。方法:我们询问了挪威市政当局的公共卫生护士、心理学家和主任医师关于兄弟姐妹支持和他们对SIBS的评价。我们在实施研究综合框架的指导下进行了描述性分析和定性分析。结果:来自253个直辖市的332名受访者参与了调查。兄弟姐妹很少被系统地识别。学校保健服务是常见的支助提供者,但主要是应家庭要求提供的。与专科保健或其他服务机构的合作有限。SIBS的预期可接受性很高,但据报道,在社区服务中实施一些障碍。结论:社区层面的兄弟姐妹支持不足,成功实施适当的干预措施需要层内和层间的合作。关键词:兄弟姐妹,近亲子女,慢性疾病,残疾,预防,实施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信