Universal Coverage on a Budget: Impacts on Health Care Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Expenditures in Thailand

S. Limwattananon, Sven Neelsen, O. O’Donnell, P. Prakongsai, V. Tangcharoensathien, E. van Doorslaer, V. Vongmongkol
{"title":"Universal Coverage on a Budget: Impacts on Health Care Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Expenditures in Thailand","authors":"S. Limwattananon, Sven Neelsen, O. O’Donnell, P. Prakongsai, V. Tangcharoensathien, E. van Doorslaer, V. Vongmongkol","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2265867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We estimate the impact on health care utilization and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures of a major reform in Thailand that extended health insurance to one-quarter of the population to achieve universal coverage while keeping health spending below 4% of GDP. Identification is through comparison of changes in outcomes of groups to whom coverage was extended with those of public sector employees and their dependents whose coverage was not affected. The reform is estimated to have reduced the probability that a sick person goes without formal treatment by 3.2 percentage points (11%). It increased the probability of receiving public ambulatory care by 2.7 ppt (5%) and of admission to a public hospital by 1 ppt (18%). OOP expenditures were reduced by one-third on average, as was the probability of spending more than 10% of the household budget on health care, while spending at the very top of the OOP distribution was reduced by one-half representing substantial reductions in exposure to medical expenditure risk. Supply-side measures implemented with the coverage extension are likely to have helped realize these effects from an increased, but still very tight, budget.","PeriodicalId":423793,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","volume":"440 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2265867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

We estimate the impact on health care utilization and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures of a major reform in Thailand that extended health insurance to one-quarter of the population to achieve universal coverage while keeping health spending below 4% of GDP. Identification is through comparison of changes in outcomes of groups to whom coverage was extended with those of public sector employees and their dependents whose coverage was not affected. The reform is estimated to have reduced the probability that a sick person goes without formal treatment by 3.2 percentage points (11%). It increased the probability of receiving public ambulatory care by 2.7 ppt (5%) and of admission to a public hospital by 1 ppt (18%). OOP expenditures were reduced by one-third on average, as was the probability of spending more than 10% of the household budget on health care, while spending at the very top of the OOP distribution was reduced by one-half representing substantial reductions in exposure to medical expenditure risk. Supply-side measures implemented with the coverage extension are likely to have helped realize these effects from an increased, but still very tight, budget.
预算全民覆盖:对泰国医疗保健利用和自付费用的影响
我们估计了泰国的一项重大改革对医疗保健利用和自付(OOP)支出的影响,该改革将医疗保险扩大到四分之一的人口,以实现全民覆盖,同时将医疗支出保持在GDP的4%以下。通过比较覆盖面扩大的群体与覆盖面未受影响的公共部门雇员及其家属的结果变化来确定。据估计,这项改革将病人得不到正式治疗的概率降低了3.2个百分点(11%)。它使接受公立门诊治疗的概率增加2.7个百分点(5%),使进入公立医院的概率增加1个百分点(18%)。面向对象的支出平均减少了三分之一,将超过10%的家庭预算用于医疗保健的可能性也减少了三分之一,而面向对象分布最顶层的支出减少了一半,这表明医疗支出风险的暴露大大减少。随着医保覆盖范围的扩大而实施的供给侧措施,很可能有助于从预算的增加(但仍然非常紧张)中实现这些效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信