Explicating Environmental Patriarchy: An Examination Through Gender and Environment Perspectives

A. Dalal
{"title":"Explicating Environmental Patriarchy: An Examination Through Gender and Environment Perspectives","authors":"A. Dalal","doi":"10.1177/2455632719880849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much has been written about the relationship between women, nature and development, a relationship where women’s work, like nature, is often undervalued, in terms of acknowledging the interdependence of women and nature in preservation of environment to foster sustainable growth. Women are perceived as prominent actors in domestic chores as well as contributors to environmental rehabilitation and conservation. However, in comparison to men, their work and knowledge have often been undervalued in both environmental planning and domestic resource management. The existence of environmental patriarchy is, thereby, located at three dimensions; first, women’s exclusion from resource ownership and management; second, women’s exclusion from deliberation of indigenous knowledge; and third, gendered power relationship in society. This article explores the region-specific concerns of women built into theoretical feminist perspectives of the Western world in contrast to the Third World countries, dealt within a theoretical perspective of ecofeminism and feminist environmentalism. However, both the models leave some major theoretical questions unanswered, finally concluded in a perspective as proposed by feminist political ecology. The idea behind doing this is to take account of the various ways of conceptualizing feminist ecological theories so as to emphasize greater role of women in environmental planning and decision-making processes. By simultaneously analysing some environmental movements, it was found that women’s activism was not only sustainable but confronted other social issues and patriarchy in private domain.","PeriodicalId":160590,"journal":{"name":"ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632719880849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much has been written about the relationship between women, nature and development, a relationship where women’s work, like nature, is often undervalued, in terms of acknowledging the interdependence of women and nature in preservation of environment to foster sustainable growth. Women are perceived as prominent actors in domestic chores as well as contributors to environmental rehabilitation and conservation. However, in comparison to men, their work and knowledge have often been undervalued in both environmental planning and domestic resource management. The existence of environmental patriarchy is, thereby, located at three dimensions; first, women’s exclusion from resource ownership and management; second, women’s exclusion from deliberation of indigenous knowledge; and third, gendered power relationship in society. This article explores the region-specific concerns of women built into theoretical feminist perspectives of the Western world in contrast to the Third World countries, dealt within a theoretical perspective of ecofeminism and feminist environmentalism. However, both the models leave some major theoretical questions unanswered, finally concluded in a perspective as proposed by feminist political ecology. The idea behind doing this is to take account of the various ways of conceptualizing feminist ecological theories so as to emphasize greater role of women in environmental planning and decision-making processes. By simultaneously analysing some environmental movements, it was found that women’s activism was not only sustainable but confronted other social issues and patriarchy in private domain.
环境父权制:性别与环境视角的考察
关于妇女、自然和发展之间的关系已经写了很多,在这种关系中,妇女的工作,就承认妇女和自然在保护环境以促进可持续增长方面的相互依存关系而言,往往被低估。妇女被认为是家务劳动中的重要角色,也是环境恢复和养护的贡献者。但是,与男子相比,她们在环境规划和国内资源管理方面的工作和知识往往被低估。因此,环境父权制的存在存在于三个维度;第一,妇女被排除在资源所有权和管理权之外;第二,女性被排除在本土知识的审议之外;第三,社会中的性别权力关系。本文从生态女性主义和女性环境主义的理论视角出发,探讨了西方世界与第三世界国家的理论女性主义视角中建立的特定地区妇女问题。然而,这两种模式都留下了一些重要的理论问题,最终以女性主义政治生态学提出的视角得出结论。这样做背后的想法是考虑到女权主义生态理论概念化的各种方式,以强调妇女在环境规划和决策过程中的更大作用。同时分析了一些环境运动,发现妇女的行动主义不仅是可持续的,而且在私人领域面对其他社会问题和父权制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书