Adaptive Capacity Planning for Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Seokjun Youn, H. N. Geismar, C. Sriskandarajah, V. Tiwari
{"title":"Adaptive Capacity Planning for Ambulatory Surgery Centers","authors":"Seokjun Youn, H. N. Geismar, C. Sriskandarajah, V. Tiwari","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3463408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: We develop a framework to plan capacity in each of three sequential stages for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The interdependence of activities, their stochastic durations, and the uncertainties in patient-mix pose significant challenges to managing the capacity of each activity and to achieving a smooth patient ow by coordinating the stages for each patient's visit. These strategic and operational decisions must efficiently cover all variations of daily patient demand. The overall objective is to minimize the total cost incurred in satisfying this demand, where the total cost is defined as the sum of the overtime cost and the amortized construction cost for the three stages. Methodology/results: In contrast to the traditional top-down approach to capacity planning, our approach proposes a bottom-up strategy based on optimization methods and data analytics. Specifically, we model ASCs as hybrid ow shops (HFS) from the scheduling literature, then relax the fixed capacity assumption of traditional HFS problems by using the trade-o_ between the overtime cost and the amortized capacity construction cost. Because the HFS is strongly NP-hard, we develop a straightforward and easy to implement heuristic to find cost-efficient capacities for the three stages. Our computational study, informed by operational-level archival patient data, examines how stochastic business parameters, e.g., patient-mix, service durations, and overnight-stay probabilities, affect the capacity planning decision. Managerial implications: Timely capacity adjustment is important for ASC practitioners, but related research is limited. This study highlights the benefit of considering the three stages together for capacity planning, rather than focusing solely on the operating rooms. We expect our approach to guide the more than 5,700 ASCs in the U.S., which perform 23 million surgeries annually, to make appropriate investments that will improve ASC operations via capacity adjustment and patient scheduling.","PeriodicalId":374055,"journal":{"name":"Scheduling eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scheduling eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3463408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Problem definition: We develop a framework to plan capacity in each of three sequential stages for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The interdependence of activities, their stochastic durations, and the uncertainties in patient-mix pose significant challenges to managing the capacity of each activity and to achieving a smooth patient ow by coordinating the stages for each patient's visit. These strategic and operational decisions must efficiently cover all variations of daily patient demand. The overall objective is to minimize the total cost incurred in satisfying this demand, where the total cost is defined as the sum of the overtime cost and the amortized construction cost for the three stages. Methodology/results: In contrast to the traditional top-down approach to capacity planning, our approach proposes a bottom-up strategy based on optimization methods and data analytics. Specifically, we model ASCs as hybrid ow shops (HFS) from the scheduling literature, then relax the fixed capacity assumption of traditional HFS problems by using the trade-o_ between the overtime cost and the amortized capacity construction cost. Because the HFS is strongly NP-hard, we develop a straightforward and easy to implement heuristic to find cost-efficient capacities for the three stages. Our computational study, informed by operational-level archival patient data, examines how stochastic business parameters, e.g., patient-mix, service durations, and overnight-stay probabilities, affect the capacity planning decision. Managerial implications: Timely capacity adjustment is important for ASC practitioners, but related research is limited. This study highlights the benefit of considering the three stages together for capacity planning, rather than focusing solely on the operating rooms. We expect our approach to guide the more than 5,700 ASCs in the U.S., which perform 23 million surgeries annually, to make appropriate investments that will improve ASC operations via capacity adjustment and patient scheduling.
门诊手术中心的适应性容量规划
问题定义:我们开发了一个框架来规划门诊手术中心(ASCs)三个连续阶段的能力。活动的相互依赖性,其随机持续时间和患者组合的不确定性对管理每个活动的能力以及通过协调每个患者的访问阶段来实现顺利的患者流程构成了重大挑战。这些战略和业务决策必须有效地涵盖患者日常需求的所有变化。总体目标是使满足这一需求所产生的总成本最小化,其中总成本定义为三个阶段的加班成本和平摊建设成本的总和。方法/结果:与传统的自上而下的容量规划方法相比,我们的方法提出了基于优化方法和数据分析的自下而上的策略。具体地说,我们将ASCs建模为调度文献中的混合车间(HFS),然后利用加班成本和平摊产能建设成本之间的权衡来放宽传统HFS问题的固定产能假设。由于HFS是强np困难的,我们开发了一个简单且易于实现的启发式方法来为这三个阶段找到成本效益高的容量。我们的计算研究,由操作级档案患者数据提供信息,检查随机业务参数,如患者组合,服务持续时间和过夜住院概率,如何影响容量规划决策。管理启示:及时的能力调整对ASC从业者很重要,但相关研究有限。这项研究强调了考虑三个阶段一起进行容量规划的好处,而不是仅仅关注手术室。我们希望我们的方法能够指导美国5700多家ASC(每年进行2300万例手术)进行适当的投资,通过能力调整和患者安排来改善ASC的操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信