INVESTIGATION OF ACADEMICIANS AND STUDENTS' PERCEPTION AND ATTITUDES FOR DISTANCE PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION EDUCATION IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Gökhan Bayrak, R. Şavkın, N. Büker
{"title":"INVESTIGATION OF ACADEMICIANS AND STUDENTS' PERCEPTION AND ATTITUDES FOR DISTANCE PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION EDUCATION IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"Gökhan Bayrak, R. Şavkın, N. Büker","doi":"10.21653/tjpr.786507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In the COVID-19 pandemic, perceptions, and attitudes of academicians and students towards distance education (DE) are essential for the DE's continuity. This study aimed to determine the perceptions and attitudes of academicians and students towards distant physiotherapy and rehabilitation education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Study information was given to 22 academicians (14 females and 8 males) assigned in DE. Academicians were filled with Perceptions Scale Questionnaire. The Web-Based Instruction Attitude Scale online survey link was sent to 620 undergraduate students. The data of 381 students (271 females and 110 males) who completed the questionnaire were analyzed. Results: The Distance Education Perceptions Scale total score of the academicians was 60.76 +/- 11.29. Increasing age (p=0.003) and length of teaching (years) (p=0.012) had a negative effect on the total score. The Web-Based Instruction Attitude Scale total score of the students was 72.11 +/- 20.29. Increasing age (p=0.006) and grade (p=0.041) has a positive influence on the total score. There was no significant gender difference in both academicians' perceptions and attitudes (p=0.973) and students (p=0.973). Conclusion: Although DE is seen as an alternative solution in ongoing educational activities during the pandemic, academicians and students thought that DE could not be equivalent to face-to-face education in terms of quality and learning outcomes. However, since it would become inevitable to use DE in many educational fields in the information age, it could create methods that would make DE a usable model in education.","PeriodicalId":289913,"journal":{"name":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.786507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In the COVID-19 pandemic, perceptions, and attitudes of academicians and students towards distance education (DE) are essential for the DE's continuity. This study aimed to determine the perceptions and attitudes of academicians and students towards distant physiotherapy and rehabilitation education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Study information was given to 22 academicians (14 females and 8 males) assigned in DE. Academicians were filled with Perceptions Scale Questionnaire. The Web-Based Instruction Attitude Scale online survey link was sent to 620 undergraduate students. The data of 381 students (271 females and 110 males) who completed the questionnaire were analyzed. Results: The Distance Education Perceptions Scale total score of the academicians was 60.76 +/- 11.29. Increasing age (p=0.003) and length of teaching (years) (p=0.012) had a negative effect on the total score. The Web-Based Instruction Attitude Scale total score of the students was 72.11 +/- 20.29. Increasing age (p=0.006) and grade (p=0.041) has a positive influence on the total score. There was no significant gender difference in both academicians' perceptions and attitudes (p=0.973) and students (p=0.973). Conclusion: Although DE is seen as an alternative solution in ongoing educational activities during the pandemic, academicians and students thought that DE could not be equivalent to face-to-face education in terms of quality and learning outcomes. However, since it would become inevitable to use DE in many educational fields in the information age, it could create methods that would make DE a usable model in education.
新冠肺炎疫情期间高校师生对远程理疗康复教育的认知和态度调查
目的:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,学者和学生对远程教育(DE)的看法和态度对远程教育的连续性至关重要。本研究旨在了解2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,院士和学生对远程物理治疗和康复教育的看法和态度。方法:对22名院士(女14名,男8名)进行问卷调查。基于网络的教学态度量表在线调查链接被发送给620名本科生。对完成问卷调查的381名学生(女271名,男110名)的数据进行分析。结果:高校院士远程教育感知量表总分为60.76±11.29分。增加年龄(p=0.003)和教学年限(p=0.012)对总分有负向影响。学生网络教学态度量表总分为72.11 +/- 20.29分。增加年龄(p=0.006)和年级(p=0.041)对总分有正影响。在教师和学生的认知和态度上,性别差异均不显著(p=0.973)。结论:虽然DE被视为疫情期间持续教育活动的一种替代方案,但学者和学生认为DE在质量和学习效果方面不能等同于面对面教育。然而,由于在信息时代,在许多教育领域使用DE是不可避免的,因此可以创造一些方法,使DE成为教育中可用的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信