Fusion of edge-less and edge-based approaches for horizon line detection

Touqeer Ahmad, G. Bebis, M. Nicolescu, A. Nefian, T. Fong
{"title":"Fusion of edge-less and edge-based approaches for horizon line detection","authors":"Touqeer Ahmad, G. Bebis, M. Nicolescu, A. Nefian, T. Fong","doi":"10.1109/IISA.2015.7387988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Horizon line detection requires finding a boundary which segments an image into sky and non-sky regions. It has many applications including visual geo-localization and geo-tagging, robot navigation/localization, and ship detection and port security. Recently, two machine learning based approaches have been proposed for horizon line detection: one relying on edge classification and the other relying on pixel classification. In the edge-based approach, a classifier is used to refine the edge map by removing non-horizon edges. The refined edge map is then used to form a multi-stage graph where dynamic programming is applied to extract the horizon line. In the edge-less approach, classification is used to obtain a confidence of horizon-ness at each pixel location. The horizon line is then extracted by applying dynamic programming on the resultant dense classification map rather than on the edge map. Both approaches have shown to outperform the classical approach where dynamic programming is applied on the non-refined edge map. In this paper, we provide a comparison between the edge-less and edge-based approaches using two challenging data sets. Moreover, we propose fusing the information about the horizon-ness and edge-ness of each pixel. Our experimental results illustrate that the proposed fusion approach outperforms both the edge-based and edge-less approaches.","PeriodicalId":433872,"journal":{"name":"2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2015.7387988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Horizon line detection requires finding a boundary which segments an image into sky and non-sky regions. It has many applications including visual geo-localization and geo-tagging, robot navigation/localization, and ship detection and port security. Recently, two machine learning based approaches have been proposed for horizon line detection: one relying on edge classification and the other relying on pixel classification. In the edge-based approach, a classifier is used to refine the edge map by removing non-horizon edges. The refined edge map is then used to form a multi-stage graph where dynamic programming is applied to extract the horizon line. In the edge-less approach, classification is used to obtain a confidence of horizon-ness at each pixel location. The horizon line is then extracted by applying dynamic programming on the resultant dense classification map rather than on the edge map. Both approaches have shown to outperform the classical approach where dynamic programming is applied on the non-refined edge map. In this paper, we provide a comparison between the edge-less and edge-based approaches using two challenging data sets. Moreover, we propose fusing the information about the horizon-ness and edge-ness of each pixel. Our experimental results illustrate that the proposed fusion approach outperforms both the edge-based and edge-less approaches.
融合无边缘和基于边缘的水平线检测方法
地平线检测需要找到将图像分割为天空和非天空区域的边界。它有许多应用,包括视觉地理定位和地理标记,机器人导航/定位,船舶检测和港口安全。最近,人们提出了两种基于机器学习的地平线检测方法:一种依赖边缘分类,另一种依赖像素分类。在基于边缘的方法中,使用分类器通过去除非水平边缘来细化边缘图。然后利用改进后的边缘图形成多阶段图,并应用动态规划方法提取水平线。在无边缘方法中,使用分类来获得每个像素位置的水平置信度。然后,通过在生成的密集分类图而不是边缘图上应用动态规划来提取水平线。这两种方法都优于经典方法,其中动态规划应用于非精细边缘映射。在本文中,我们使用两个具有挑战性的数据集对无边缘和基于边缘的方法进行了比较。此外,我们提出融合每个像素的水平和边缘信息。实验结果表明,所提出的融合方法优于基于边缘和无边缘的融合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信