Minsky's ‘Cushions of Safety', Systemic Risk and the Crisis in the Subprime Mortgage Market

J. Kregel
{"title":"Minsky's ‘Cushions of Safety', Systemic Risk and the Crisis in the Subprime Mortgage Market","authors":"J. Kregel","doi":"10.3917/FBC.031.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current crisis in the financial systems of developed countries is often explained in terms of Hyman P. Minsky’s financial fragility hypothesis. Minsky was an economist at the Levy Institute and the foremost expert on credit crunches. His hypothesis was that the structure of a capitalist economy becomes more fragile over a period of prosperity; that is, endogenous processes breed financial and economic instability. In this brief, Senior Scholar Jan Kregel explains how the current crisis differs from the traditional Minsky hypothesis. He reviews Minsky’s concept of a margin or “cushion” of safety, financial fragility, and debt deflation. He concludes that, while the current subprime mortgage crisis involves both Ponzi financing and declining margins of safety, these conditions are not the result of endogenous processes. Rather, the crisis is the result of insufficient margins of safety based on how credit worthiness is assessed (the undervaluation and mispricing of risk) in the new “originate and distribute” financial system.","PeriodicalId":102340,"journal":{"name":"Finance & Bien Commun","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"137","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance & Bien Commun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/FBC.031.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 137

Abstract

The current crisis in the financial systems of developed countries is often explained in terms of Hyman P. Minsky’s financial fragility hypothesis. Minsky was an economist at the Levy Institute and the foremost expert on credit crunches. His hypothesis was that the structure of a capitalist economy becomes more fragile over a period of prosperity; that is, endogenous processes breed financial and economic instability. In this brief, Senior Scholar Jan Kregel explains how the current crisis differs from the traditional Minsky hypothesis. He reviews Minsky’s concept of a margin or “cushion” of safety, financial fragility, and debt deflation. He concludes that, while the current subprime mortgage crisis involves both Ponzi financing and declining margins of safety, these conditions are not the result of endogenous processes. Rather, the crisis is the result of insufficient margins of safety based on how credit worthiness is assessed (the undervaluation and mispricing of risk) in the new “originate and distribute” financial system.
明斯基的“安全缓冲”、系统性风险和次级抵押贷款市场危机
当前发达国家金融体系的危机通常用海曼·明斯基的金融脆弱性假说来解释。明斯基是利维研究所(Levy Institute)的经济学家,也是研究信贷危机的权威专家。他的假设是,资本主义经济的结构在繁荣时期变得更加脆弱;也就是说,内生过程孕育了金融和经济的不稳定。在本文中,资深学者Jan Kregel解释了当前危机与传统明斯基假说的不同之处。他回顾了明斯基关于安全、金融脆弱性和债务通缩的边际或“缓冲”概念。他的结论是,尽管当前的次贷危机涉及庞氏融资和安全边际下降,但这些情况并不是内生过程的结果。更确切地说,这场危机是由于在新的“发起和分配”金融体系中,基于信用价值评估方式(风险的低估和错误定价)的安全边际不足造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信