{"title":"The Anti-capitalist Commons","authors":"Vangelis Papadimitropoulos","doi":"10.16997/book46.d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter four critically reviews the anti-capitalist literature on the commons, comprising of various interpretations of Marx’s work, among others. The first section investigates the relation of the political and the common in a broad spectrum of continental political philosophy, including ‘post-hegemony’ notably Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and the autonomous Marxist tradition (Michael Hardt and Toni Negri) in the context of Alexandros Kioupkiolis’s critique who points to the crowding out of the self-instituting power of the people in several Marxist and post-Marxist interpretations of the common. The second section focuses on the work of Pierre Dardot and Christian Laval who have reintroduced the self-instituting power of the people in political discourse as the essential concept of ‘the common’. The third section illustrates a more concrete version of the common, articulated in the Katharine Gibson and Julie Graham’s work, who sketch out the philosophical and empirical preconditions of a community economy. The fourth section deals with the concept of the common as the self-instituting power of the people to introduce variants of autonomous Marxism, ranging from post-capitalism to anti-capitalism. Lastly, the fifth section examines the conception of the common in the context of autonomous and classical Marxist views . Authors discussed include Nick Dyer-Witheford, Massimo De Angelis, George Caffentzis, Silvia Federici, Slavoj Žižek, Jodi Dean, David Harvey, Paul Mason and Christian Fuchs. The author concludes that a set of policies could be integrated into a holistic, post-hegemonic strategy for a post-capitalist, commons-orientated transition drawing also on some reformist perspectives.","PeriodicalId":252993,"journal":{"name":"The Commons: Economic Alternatives in the Digital Age","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Commons: Economic Alternatives in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16997/book46.d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chapter four critically reviews the anti-capitalist literature on the commons, comprising of various interpretations of Marx’s work, among others. The first section investigates the relation of the political and the common in a broad spectrum of continental political philosophy, including ‘post-hegemony’ notably Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and the autonomous Marxist tradition (Michael Hardt and Toni Negri) in the context of Alexandros Kioupkiolis’s critique who points to the crowding out of the self-instituting power of the people in several Marxist and post-Marxist interpretations of the common. The second section focuses on the work of Pierre Dardot and Christian Laval who have reintroduced the self-instituting power of the people in political discourse as the essential concept of ‘the common’. The third section illustrates a more concrete version of the common, articulated in the Katharine Gibson and Julie Graham’s work, who sketch out the philosophical and empirical preconditions of a community economy. The fourth section deals with the concept of the common as the self-instituting power of the people to introduce variants of autonomous Marxism, ranging from post-capitalism to anti-capitalism. Lastly, the fifth section examines the conception of the common in the context of autonomous and classical Marxist views . Authors discussed include Nick Dyer-Witheford, Massimo De Angelis, George Caffentzis, Silvia Federici, Slavoj Žižek, Jodi Dean, David Harvey, Paul Mason and Christian Fuchs. The author concludes that a set of policies could be integrated into a holistic, post-hegemonic strategy for a post-capitalist, commons-orientated transition drawing also on some reformist perspectives.
第四章批判性地回顾了关于公地的反资本主义文献,其中包括对马克思作品的各种解释。第一部分在大陆政治哲学的广泛范围内研究政治和共同的关系,包括“后霸权”,特别是埃内斯托·拉克劳和尚塔尔·墨菲,以及自主的马克思主义传统(迈克尔·哈特和托尼·内格里),在亚历山德罗斯·基普基利斯的批评背景下,他指出在几个马克思主义和后马克思主义对共同的解释中,人们的自我建立的权力被挤出了。第二部分着重于皮埃尔·达多和克里斯蒂安·拉瓦尔的工作,他们重新将人民在政治话语中的自我建立的权力作为“共同”的基本概念。第三部分阐述了共同的更具体的版本,在凯瑟琳·吉布森和朱莉·格雷厄姆的作品中得到了阐述,他们概述了社区经济的哲学和经验前提。第四部分探讨作为人民自我建立的权力的公共概念,以介绍从后资本主义到反资本主义的自治马克思主义的变体。最后,第五部分在自主和经典马克思主义观点的背景下考察了共同性的概念。讨论的作者包括Nick Dyer-Witheford, Massimo De Angelis, George Caffentzis, Silvia Federici, Slavoj Žižek, Jodi Dean, David Harvey, Paul Mason和Christian Fuchs。作者的结论是,一系列政策可以被整合到一个整体的、后霸权的战略中,以实现后资本主义、以共同为导向的转型,同时也借鉴了一些改良主义的观点。