Exploring the Contribution of Innovation Intermediaries to the New Product Development (NPD) Process: A Typology and an Empirical Study

Gabriele Colombo, C. Dell’Era, F. Frattini
{"title":"Exploring the Contribution of Innovation Intermediaries to the New Product Development (NPD) Process: A Typology and an Empirical Study","authors":"Gabriele Colombo, C. Dell’Era, F. Frattini","doi":"10.1111/radm.12056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the ‘knowledge economy’ upheld by the European Lisbon strategy, knowledge‐intensive services are considered a key driver for innovation and competitiveness. A category of knowledge‐intensive services that has become of utmost importance in the last few decades is new product development (NPD) services, which interconnect distant knowledge domains with the client firms. In addition to NPD service providers, web‐based innovation intermediaries have started to help innovative firms access dispersed bodies of knowledge. Despite the heterogeneity of their characteristics, however, a clear typology of the strategies used by traditional NPD service providers and web‐based intermediaries to interact with their knowledge sources and with their clients is missing. This typology would be very useful for those firms that are willing to collaborate with innovation intermediaries because it could highlight the typologies of NPD problems different intermediaries are apt to address and the managerial challenges that working with them entails. Developing such a classification framework is the main goal of this paper. The typology proposed in this paper suggests that innovation intermediaries should be distinguished based on the following: (1) the way they access their distributed knowledge sources and (2) the way they deliver value to their clients. By combining these two dimensions, four categories of innovation intermediaries are identified, which are named brokers, mediators, collectors and connectors. A multiple case study analysis involving four innovation intermediaries and 12 of their clients is presented in the paper. The analysis provides exploratory insights into (1) the typologies of NPD problems that each class of intermediaries addresses and (2) the managerial challenges that working with each of them entails. These preliminary findings call for further theoretical and empirical research into the complex interaction among innovation intermediaries, their dispersed sources of knowledge and their clients.","PeriodicalId":344620,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

In the ‘knowledge economy’ upheld by the European Lisbon strategy, knowledge‐intensive services are considered a key driver for innovation and competitiveness. A category of knowledge‐intensive services that has become of utmost importance in the last few decades is new product development (NPD) services, which interconnect distant knowledge domains with the client firms. In addition to NPD service providers, web‐based innovation intermediaries have started to help innovative firms access dispersed bodies of knowledge. Despite the heterogeneity of their characteristics, however, a clear typology of the strategies used by traditional NPD service providers and web‐based intermediaries to interact with their knowledge sources and with their clients is missing. This typology would be very useful for those firms that are willing to collaborate with innovation intermediaries because it could highlight the typologies of NPD problems different intermediaries are apt to address and the managerial challenges that working with them entails. Developing such a classification framework is the main goal of this paper. The typology proposed in this paper suggests that innovation intermediaries should be distinguished based on the following: (1) the way they access their distributed knowledge sources and (2) the way they deliver value to their clients. By combining these two dimensions, four categories of innovation intermediaries are identified, which are named brokers, mediators, collectors and connectors. A multiple case study analysis involving four innovation intermediaries and 12 of their clients is presented in the paper. The analysis provides exploratory insights into (1) the typologies of NPD problems that each class of intermediaries addresses and (2) the managerial challenges that working with each of them entails. These preliminary findings call for further theoretical and empirical research into the complex interaction among innovation intermediaries, their dispersed sources of knowledge and their clients.
创新中介对新产品开发过程的贡献:一个类型学与实证研究
在欧洲里斯本战略所倡导的“知识经济”中,知识密集型服务被认为是创新和竞争力的关键驱动力。在过去的几十年里,知识密集型服务的一个类别是新产品开发(NPD)服务,它将遥远的知识领域与客户公司相互连接起来。除了NPD服务提供商,基于网络的创新中介机构已经开始帮助创新企业获取分散的知识体系。然而,尽管他们的特征具有异质性,传统的NPD服务提供商和基于网络的中介机构在与他们的知识来源和客户进行互动时所使用的策略的明确类型仍然缺失。这种类型对于那些愿意与创新中介机构合作的公司来说非常有用,因为它可以突出不同中介机构容易解决的NPD问题的类型,以及与他们合作所带来的管理挑战。开发这样一个分类框架是本文的主要目标。本文提出的类型学建议,创新中介应该根据以下方面进行区分:(1)他们访问分布式知识来源的方式;(2)他们向客户提供价值的方式。通过结合这两个维度,可以确定四类创新中介,它们分别被命名为代理、中介、收集器和连接器。本文对四家创新中介机构及其12家客户进行了多案例分析。该分析提供了探索性的见解:(1)每一类中介机构所解决的NPD问题的类型;(2)与每一类中介机构合作所带来的管理挑战。这些初步发现要求对创新中介、其分散的知识来源及其客户之间复杂的相互作用进行进一步的理论和实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信