{"title":"Assessment of Health Risks Associated with Particulate Matter and Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Biomass Fuels Utilization in Western Kenya","authors":"C. Munyao, K. Kiptoo, G. Simiyu","doi":"10.47672/ejhs.1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The use of biomass fuels poses great threats to environmental degradation and public health risk accounting for 32% of the total attributable burden of diseases due to indoor air pollution (IAP) in especially Africa. Heavy reliance on biomass fuels for household energy in Kenya makes the country more vulnerable with 90% of the rural population relying on biomass fuels for domestic purposes. The objective of this study was to assess cooking fuel types and efficiency of improved biomass stoves in fuel consumption in Western, Kenya. \nMethodology: The data were collected through continuous real-time monitoring of kitchen Particulate Matter and Carbon II Oxide concentration for a period of 24 hours using UCB-PATS and CO monitors, questionnaires and time activity budgets. The total target population was 383 households and 204 households were selected as the sample size for HH survey. The sample size was determined using sample size algorithm by Boyd et al. (2014) where a sample size is determined by the sample population size. Selection of households for indoor air monitoring was done through quasi system where there was a predefined criterion from survey data. Tables and means were used to present results. \nFindings: The study found that Hazard quotients (HQ) for both long-term and short-term PM exposure using all stoves were all above 1 implying that health risk is real. During 24-hour cooking duration, three-stone stove using crop residues produced 145.8 times higher PM2.5 compared to RfD (Reference Dose) value while Cheprocket produced 26.4 times higher than PM2.5 RfD. People using solid biomass fuels are likely to experience headaches and running nose by the end of 24-hour period as a result of CO exposure when mud rocket stove, three stone stove and Cheprocket stoves were used. However cooks who use Chepkube stoves are not likely to experience any adverse health effects from CO exposures since the HQs were less than 1 using both wood and crop residues as fuel. The study concluded that, improved biomass stoves provided an overall reduction in pollutant concentration compared to three-stone fire but the local innovation Chepkube stove that has been classified as ungraded stove had the highest pollutant reduction. There is no health risk associated with exposure to peak CO within the 1-hour duration from all biomass stoves monitored in the study area. \nRecommendation: The study recommended that user education is necessary on kitchen practices to reduce overall exposure from improved stove utilization.","PeriodicalId":224837,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The use of biomass fuels poses great threats to environmental degradation and public health risk accounting for 32% of the total attributable burden of diseases due to indoor air pollution (IAP) in especially Africa. Heavy reliance on biomass fuels for household energy in Kenya makes the country more vulnerable with 90% of the rural population relying on biomass fuels for domestic purposes. The objective of this study was to assess cooking fuel types and efficiency of improved biomass stoves in fuel consumption in Western, Kenya.
Methodology: The data were collected through continuous real-time monitoring of kitchen Particulate Matter and Carbon II Oxide concentration for a period of 24 hours using UCB-PATS and CO monitors, questionnaires and time activity budgets. The total target population was 383 households and 204 households were selected as the sample size for HH survey. The sample size was determined using sample size algorithm by Boyd et al. (2014) where a sample size is determined by the sample population size. Selection of households for indoor air monitoring was done through quasi system where there was a predefined criterion from survey data. Tables and means were used to present results.
Findings: The study found that Hazard quotients (HQ) for both long-term and short-term PM exposure using all stoves were all above 1 implying that health risk is real. During 24-hour cooking duration, three-stone stove using crop residues produced 145.8 times higher PM2.5 compared to RfD (Reference Dose) value while Cheprocket produced 26.4 times higher than PM2.5 RfD. People using solid biomass fuels are likely to experience headaches and running nose by the end of 24-hour period as a result of CO exposure when mud rocket stove, three stone stove and Cheprocket stoves were used. However cooks who use Chepkube stoves are not likely to experience any adverse health effects from CO exposures since the HQs were less than 1 using both wood and crop residues as fuel. The study concluded that, improved biomass stoves provided an overall reduction in pollutant concentration compared to three-stone fire but the local innovation Chepkube stove that has been classified as ungraded stove had the highest pollutant reduction. There is no health risk associated with exposure to peak CO within the 1-hour duration from all biomass stoves monitored in the study area.
Recommendation: The study recommended that user education is necessary on kitchen practices to reduce overall exposure from improved stove utilization.
目的:生物质燃料的使用对环境退化和公共健康风险构成巨大威胁,占室内空气污染(IAP)所致疾病总可归因负担的32%,特别是在非洲。肯尼亚家庭能源对生物质燃料的严重依赖使该国更加脆弱,90%的农村人口依靠生物质燃料用于家庭目的。本研究的目的是评估烹饪燃料类型和改进的生物质炉在肯尼亚西部燃料消耗方面的效率。方法:通过使用UCB-PATS和CO监测仪、问卷调查和时间活动预算对厨房颗粒物和碳II氧化物浓度进行连续24小时实时监测,收集数据。总目标人口为383户,HH调查选取204户作为样本量。样本量由Boyd et al.(2014)使用样本量算法确定,其中样本量由样本总体大小决定。通过准系统选择进行室内空气监测的家庭,该系统根据调查数据预先确定标准。采用表格和方法来显示结果。研究结果:研究发现,使用所有炉灶长期和短期接触PM的危害商数(HQ)都大于1,这意味着健康风险是真实存在的。在24小时的烹饪过程中,使用农作物秸秆的三石炉产生的PM2.5比RfD(参考剂量)值高出145.8倍,而Cheprocket产生的PM2.5比RfD高出26.4倍。使用固体生物质燃料的人在使用泥火箭炉、三石炉和Cheprocket炉时,由于接触CO,很可能在24小时结束时出现头痛和流鼻涕。然而,使用Chepkube炉灶的厨师不太可能因CO暴露而对健康产生任何不利影响,因为使用木材和作物残留物作为燃料的总部值小于1。该研究得出结论,与三石炉相比,改进的生物质炉提供了污染物浓度的总体降低,但被归类为未分级炉的当地创新Chepkube炉的污染物减少幅度最大。在研究区域监测的所有生物质炉在1小时内暴露于峰值CO没有健康风险。建议:该研究建议,有必要对用户进行厨房实践教育,以减少炉子利用率提高带来的总体暴露。