Privity in e-Contract in Nigeria

Olubukola Adeyemi Olugasa, Veronica Ekundayo, Omobamidele O. Olufemi, Omolola A. Ogbolumani
{"title":"Privity in e-Contract in Nigeria","authors":"Olubukola Adeyemi Olugasa, Veronica Ekundayo, Omobamidele O. Olufemi, Omolola A. Ogbolumani","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2687291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The doctrine of privity of contract excludes a third party to a contract from claiming a right under a contract between specific parties that have voluntarily entered into the contract. It renders a third party a meddlesome interloper. That third party can neither enforce the contract nor be made liable in the contract. But there are exceptions to this general rule of the doctrine. These exceptions include the statuses of third party insurance, agency, trustee, and guarantor/surety. With the advent of e-contract it appears this doctrine can no longer hold sway across jurisdictions. By the nature of e-contract several parties may be involved in the formation of a contract between two parties. E-contracts are formed by the parties to it through the internet platform. Usually that platform is made up of different actors. These actors include the parties to the contract, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Internet Content Providers (ICPs), manufacturers of hardware and software through which the parties connect and sometimes their agents as well. These actors hold the reins of the fundamental aspect of contract which is communication between the direct traditional parties to the contract. Any mistake by failure, negligence, or accident on the part of these actors could result in vitiating the contract or end up in breach of contract or fragrant frustration of the contract. Whereas a number of jurisdictions have one way or the other taken care of this innovation induced gap in their e-contract Nigeria is yet to close up the gap. The purpose of the paper is to re-appraise the doctrine and consider its status in contemporary contract, particularly e-contract, and suggest reforms in law of contract in that regard in Nigeria. The conduct of business transactions across the world is witnessing a new paradigm shift, an aspect of which this paper seeks to discuss and suggest a workable legal regime towards ensuring the purpose of law of contract by adopting the ‘liberal’ approach that recognizes the relationship between law and technology for the Nigerian jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":120850,"journal":{"name":"African Law eJournal","volume":"32 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2687291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The doctrine of privity of contract excludes a third party to a contract from claiming a right under a contract between specific parties that have voluntarily entered into the contract. It renders a third party a meddlesome interloper. That third party can neither enforce the contract nor be made liable in the contract. But there are exceptions to this general rule of the doctrine. These exceptions include the statuses of third party insurance, agency, trustee, and guarantor/surety. With the advent of e-contract it appears this doctrine can no longer hold sway across jurisdictions. By the nature of e-contract several parties may be involved in the formation of a contract between two parties. E-contracts are formed by the parties to it through the internet platform. Usually that platform is made up of different actors. These actors include the parties to the contract, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Internet Content Providers (ICPs), manufacturers of hardware and software through which the parties connect and sometimes their agents as well. These actors hold the reins of the fundamental aspect of contract which is communication between the direct traditional parties to the contract. Any mistake by failure, negligence, or accident on the part of these actors could result in vitiating the contract or end up in breach of contract or fragrant frustration of the contract. Whereas a number of jurisdictions have one way or the other taken care of this innovation induced gap in their e-contract Nigeria is yet to close up the gap. The purpose of the paper is to re-appraise the doctrine and consider its status in contemporary contract, particularly e-contract, and suggest reforms in law of contract in that regard in Nigeria. The conduct of business transactions across the world is witnessing a new paradigm shift, an aspect of which this paper seeks to discuss and suggest a workable legal regime towards ensuring the purpose of law of contract by adopting the ‘liberal’ approach that recognizes the relationship between law and technology for the Nigerian jurisdiction.
尼日利亚电子合同中的私密性
合同的串通原则排除了合同的第三方根据自愿订立合同的特定当事人之间的合同主张权利。它使第三方成为好管闲事的闯入者。该第三方既不能执行合同,也不承担合同责任。但这一理论的一般规则也有例外。这些例外情况包括第三方保险、代理、受托人和担保人/担保人的身份。随着电子合同的出现,这一原则似乎不再能够在各个司法管辖区占据主导地位。由于电子合同的性质,在两方之间形成合同时可能涉及多个当事方。电子合同是当事人通过互联网平台形成的合同。通常这个平台是由不同的参与者组成的。这些行为者包括合同各方、互联网服务提供商(ISPs)、互联网内容提供商(icp)、双方通过其连接的硬件和软件制造商,有时也包括他们的代理。这些行为者掌握着合同的基本方面,即合同的直接传统当事方之间的沟通。这些行为者的任何失误、疏忽或意外都可能导致合同无效或最终违约或合同受挫。尽管许多司法管辖区已经以某种方式解决了电子合同中这种创新引起的差距,但尼日利亚尚未缩小这一差距。本文的目的是重新评估该学说,并考虑其在当代合同,特别是电子合同中的地位,并建议尼日利亚在这方面的合同法改革。世界各地的商业交易行为正在见证一种新的范式转变,本文试图讨论并提出一种可行的法律制度,通过采用“自由”的方法,承认尼日利亚司法管辖区的法律与技术之间的关系,以确保合同法的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信