Sandel, M.J. (2020) The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

K. Oldfield
{"title":"Sandel, M.J. (2020) The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.","authors":"K. Oldfield","doi":"10.13001/jwcs.v7i1.7251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michael Sandel, a professor of government theory at Harvard University Law School, considers how merit, an allegedly neutral standard, has become the guiding principle for deciding which candidate is best qualified for a position. Given their power to grant credentials, college faculty have become the primary arbiters in establishing who’s competent, who’s not, and what graduates must know to be deemed qualified. Who will be credentialed and who won’t. Having a college diploma proves you are smarter than someone who didn’t go beyond high school, if that far. Sandel asserts that this obsession with ‘credentialism,’ as he calls it, has caused too many college graduates to harbor feelings of conceit and condescension toward the uncredentialled, especially members of the working class (hereinafter also meant to include poverty-class individuals), whom Sandal defines as those employed in ‘manual labor, service industry, and clerical jobs.’ Credentialism is, in Sandel’s words, ‘the last acceptable prejudice.’","PeriodicalId":258091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Working-Class Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Working-Class Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13001/jwcs.v7i1.7251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Michael Sandel, a professor of government theory at Harvard University Law School, considers how merit, an allegedly neutral standard, has become the guiding principle for deciding which candidate is best qualified for a position. Given their power to grant credentials, college faculty have become the primary arbiters in establishing who’s competent, who’s not, and what graduates must know to be deemed qualified. Who will be credentialed and who won’t. Having a college diploma proves you are smarter than someone who didn’t go beyond high school, if that far. Sandel asserts that this obsession with ‘credentialism,’ as he calls it, has caused too many college graduates to harbor feelings of conceit and condescension toward the uncredentialled, especially members of the working class (hereinafter also meant to include poverty-class individuals), whom Sandal defines as those employed in ‘manual labor, service industry, and clerical jobs.’ Credentialism is, in Sandel’s words, ‘the last acceptable prejudice.’
桑德尔,M.J.(2020)功绩的暴政:什么是共同利益?法拉,斯特劳斯和吉鲁。
哈佛大学法学院(Harvard University Law School)政府理论教授迈克尔•桑德尔(Michael Sandel)认为,所谓的中立标准——绩效,是如何成为决定哪位候选人最适合某个职位的指导原则的。鉴于他们授予证书的权力,大学教师已经成为确定谁有能力,谁没有能力,以及毕业生必须知道什么才能被认为合格的主要仲裁者。谁会被认证,谁不会。拥有大学文凭可以证明你比那些高中以上学历的人更聪明。桑德尔断言,这种对他所谓的“资历主义”的痴迷,导致太多的大学毕业生对没有资历的人怀有自负和优越感,尤其是工人阶级(以下也包括贫困阶级的个人),桑德尔将其定义为从事“体力劳动、服务业和文书工作”的人。用桑德尔的话来说,资历主义是“最后一种可以接受的偏见”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信