The need for cycloplegic refraction in adolescents and young adults

L. Hagen, S. Gilson, R. Baraas
{"title":"The need for cycloplegic refraction in adolescents and young adults","authors":"L. Hagen, S. Gilson, R. Baraas","doi":"10.15626/sjovs.v16i1.3481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cycloplegic refraction is considered the gold standard method when examining children and for ensuring accurate refractive error assessment within epidemiological studies. Recent reports underline that cycloplegia is equally important for ensuring accurate refractive error assessment in Chinese adolescents and young adults (Sun et al., 2018). The aim of this study was to assess whether cycloplegia is of equal importance for refractive error assessment in Norwegian adolescents and young adults. Non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction (Huvitz HRK-8000A), and cycloplegic ocular biometry (IOLMaster 700), were undertaken in 215 Norwegian adolescents (101 males) aged 16–17 years. Topical cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% was used for cycloplegia. Two years later, autorefraction and ocular biometry were repeated in 93 of the participants (34 males), both non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic. Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive errors (SER = sphere + 1⁄2 cylinder) were more myopic (less hyperopic) than cycloplegic SER in 93.6% of the participants (overall mean ±SD difference in SER: -0.59 ±0.50 D, 95% limit of agreement: -1.58 – 0.39 D). Refractive error classification by non-cycloplegic SER underestimated the hyperopia frequency (10.4% vs. 41.4%; SER ≥ +0.75 D) and overestimated the myopia frequency (12.1% vs. 10.7%; SER ≤ -0.75 D), as compared with refractive error classification by cycloplegic SER. Mean crystalline lens thickness decreased and mean anterior chamber depth increased with cycloplegia, with the largest changes in the hyperopes compared with the emmetropes and myopes (p ≤ 0.04). The individual differences between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic SER varied by more than ±0.25 D between first and second visit for 31% of the participants. Accurate baseline measurements — as well as follow-up measurements — are imperative for deciding when and what to prescribe for myopic and hyperopic children, adolescents, and young adults. The results here confirm that cycloplegia is necessary to ensure accurate measurement of refractive errors in Norwegian adolescents and young adults.","PeriodicalId":222252,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15626/sjovs.v16i1.3481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cycloplegic refraction is considered the gold standard method when examining children and for ensuring accurate refractive error assessment within epidemiological studies. Recent reports underline that cycloplegia is equally important for ensuring accurate refractive error assessment in Chinese adolescents and young adults (Sun et al., 2018). The aim of this study was to assess whether cycloplegia is of equal importance for refractive error assessment in Norwegian adolescents and young adults. Non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction (Huvitz HRK-8000A), and cycloplegic ocular biometry (IOLMaster 700), were undertaken in 215 Norwegian adolescents (101 males) aged 16–17 years. Topical cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% was used for cycloplegia. Two years later, autorefraction and ocular biometry were repeated in 93 of the participants (34 males), both non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic. Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive errors (SER = sphere + 1⁄2 cylinder) were more myopic (less hyperopic) than cycloplegic SER in 93.6% of the participants (overall mean ±SD difference in SER: -0.59 ±0.50 D, 95% limit of agreement: -1.58 – 0.39 D). Refractive error classification by non-cycloplegic SER underestimated the hyperopia frequency (10.4% vs. 41.4%; SER ≥ +0.75 D) and overestimated the myopia frequency (12.1% vs. 10.7%; SER ≤ -0.75 D), as compared with refractive error classification by cycloplegic SER. Mean crystalline lens thickness decreased and mean anterior chamber depth increased with cycloplegia, with the largest changes in the hyperopes compared with the emmetropes and myopes (p ≤ 0.04). The individual differences between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic SER varied by more than ±0.25 D between first and second visit for 31% of the participants. Accurate baseline measurements — as well as follow-up measurements — are imperative for deciding when and what to prescribe for myopic and hyperopic children, adolescents, and young adults. The results here confirm that cycloplegia is necessary to ensure accurate measurement of refractive errors in Norwegian adolescents and young adults.
青少年和年轻成人对睫状体麻痹性屈光的需求
在检查儿童和确保在流行病学研究中准确评估屈光不正时,睫状体麻痹性屈光不正被认为是金标准方法。最近的报告强调,单眼截瘫对于确保中国青少年和年轻人的准确屈光不正评估同样重要(Sun et al., 2018)。本研究的目的是评估挪威青少年和年轻人的屈光不正评估是否同样重要。对215名16-17岁的挪威青少年(101名男性)进行了非独眼性和独眼性自身屈光(Huvitz HRK-8000A)和独眼性眼部生物测定(IOLMaster 700)。1%盐酸环戊酸酯外用治疗睫状体麻痹。两年后,93名参与者(34名男性),包括非睫状体麻痹和睫状体麻痹,再次进行了自体屈光和眼部生物测量。在93.6%的参与者中,非独眼瘫痪患者的球形等效屈光不正(SER =球体+ 1 / 2圆柱体)比独眼瘫痪患者的SER更近视(少远视)(SER的总体平均值±SD差:-0.59±0.50 D, 95%一致性限:-1.58 - 0.39 D)。非独眼瘫痪患者的SER屈光不正分类低估了远视的频率(10.4%比41.4%;SER≥+0.75 D)和高估近视频率(12.1% vs. 10.7%;SER≤-0.75 D),与单眼瘫痪SER屈光不全分级比较。单眼截瘫患者晶状体平均厚度下降,平均前房深度增加,其中远斜视比近斜视和近视眼变化最大(p≤0.04)。31%的参与者在第一次和第二次访问期间,非独眼瘫痪患者和独眼瘫痪患者SER的个体差异超过±0.25 D。准确的基线测量-以及后续测量-对于决定何时以及如何为近视和远视的儿童、青少年和年轻人开处方至关重要。这里的结果证实,单眼截瘫是必要的,以确保准确测量屈光不正在挪威青少年和年轻人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信