{"title":"Google Scholar's Ranking Algorithm: The Impact of Articles' Age (An Empirical Study)","authors":"J. Beel, Bela Gipp","doi":"10.1109/ITNG.2009.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Google Scholar is one of the major academic search engines but its ranking algorithm for academic articles is unknown. In recent studies we partly reverse-engineered the algorithm. This paper presents the results of our third study. While the first study provided a broad overview and the second study focused on researching the impact of citation counts, the current study focused on analyzing the correlation of an article’s age and its ranking in Google Scholar. In other words, it was analyzed if older/recent published articles are more/less likely to appear in a top position in Google Scholar’s result lists. For our study, age and rankings of 1,099,749 articles retrieved via 2,100 search queries were analyzed. The analysis revealed that an article’s age seems to play no significant role in Google Scholar’s ranking algorithm. It is also discussed why this might lead to a suboptimal ranking.","PeriodicalId":347761,"journal":{"name":"2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2009.317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Abstract
Google Scholar is one of the major academic search engines but its ranking algorithm for academic articles is unknown. In recent studies we partly reverse-engineered the algorithm. This paper presents the results of our third study. While the first study provided a broad overview and the second study focused on researching the impact of citation counts, the current study focused on analyzing the correlation of an article’s age and its ranking in Google Scholar. In other words, it was analyzed if older/recent published articles are more/less likely to appear in a top position in Google Scholar’s result lists. For our study, age and rankings of 1,099,749 articles retrieved via 2,100 search queries were analyzed. The analysis revealed that an article’s age seems to play no significant role in Google Scholar’s ranking algorithm. It is also discussed why this might lead to a suboptimal ranking.
Google Scholar是主要的学术搜索引擎之一,但其对学术文章的排名算法尚不清楚。在最近的研究中,我们部分地对算法进行了逆向工程。本文介绍了我们第三次研究的结果。第一项研究提供了一个广泛的概述,第二项研究侧重于研究引用计数的影响,而当前的研究侧重于分析文章的年龄与其在Google Scholar中的排名之间的相关性。换句话说,它分析了旧的/最近发表的文章是否更有可能出现在谷歌学术搜索结果列表的顶部位置。在我们的研究中,分析了通过2100个搜索查询检索到的1,099,749篇文章的年龄和排名。分析显示,文章的年龄似乎在谷歌学术排名算法中没有重要作用。还讨论了为什么这可能导致次优排名。