Design and Analysis of Novel Co2 Conditioning Processes in the 3d Project

Wentao Gong, Rik Timmermans, Eryk Remiezowicz, P. Fosbøl, N. von Solms
{"title":"Design and Analysis of Novel Co2 Conditioning Processes in the 3d Project","authors":"Wentao Gong, Rik Timmermans, Eryk Remiezowicz, P. Fosbøl, N. von Solms","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3819391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, CO2 conditioning processes for ship-based CCS chain are modelled using simulation software APSEN HYSYS. The case study uses the captured CO2 gas from the 3D project as the feed. The feed gas is saturated with water and contains H2S and CO as impurities. The purification processes for dehydration, desulfurization and CO removal are reviewed. Two liquefaction approaches, open cycle liquefaction and closed cycle liquefaction, are modelled and compared for transport pressure 7 bar and 15 bar. It is found that the energy requirement of the open cycle liquefaction process is higher than that of the closed cycle liquefaction process. For the closed cycle liquefaction, two refrigerants: ammonia and propane are considered. Results show that the energy requirement of the process using ammonia is lower than the process using propane. When comparing the two transport pressures it is found that liquefaction at 15 bar requires less energy than 7 bar. On top of that, both refrigerants are unsuited for the liquefaction of CO2 at 7 bar as their operating pressures are below 1 atm. Several optimization methods are tested on the closed cycle liquefaction design. The net power consumption of the closes cycle liquefaction is reduced after utilizing intermediate pressure ammonia cold from CO stripper for pre-cooling.","PeriodicalId":311060,"journal":{"name":"15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 2020 (GHGT-15)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 2020 (GHGT-15)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3819391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, CO2 conditioning processes for ship-based CCS chain are modelled using simulation software APSEN HYSYS. The case study uses the captured CO2 gas from the 3D project as the feed. The feed gas is saturated with water and contains H2S and CO as impurities. The purification processes for dehydration, desulfurization and CO removal are reviewed. Two liquefaction approaches, open cycle liquefaction and closed cycle liquefaction, are modelled and compared for transport pressure 7 bar and 15 bar. It is found that the energy requirement of the open cycle liquefaction process is higher than that of the closed cycle liquefaction process. For the closed cycle liquefaction, two refrigerants: ammonia and propane are considered. Results show that the energy requirement of the process using ammonia is lower than the process using propane. When comparing the two transport pressures it is found that liquefaction at 15 bar requires less energy than 7 bar. On top of that, both refrigerants are unsuited for the liquefaction of CO2 at 7 bar as their operating pressures are below 1 atm. Several optimization methods are tested on the closed cycle liquefaction design. The net power consumption of the closes cycle liquefaction is reduced after utilizing intermediate pressure ammonia cold from CO stripper for pre-cooling.
三维工程中新型Co2调节工艺的设计与分析
在这项工作中,利用仿真软件APSEN HYSYS对船舶CCS链的二氧化碳调节过程进行了建模。该案例研究使用从3D项目中捕获的二氧化碳气体作为饲料。原料气被水饱和,含有H2S和CO作为杂质。综述了脱水法、脱硫法和除一氧化碳法的净化工艺。两种液化方法,开式循环液化和闭式循环液化,模拟和比较运输压力7巴和15巴。研究发现,开式循环液化过程的能量需求高于闭式循环液化过程。对于闭式循环液化,考虑两种制冷剂:氨和丙烷。结果表明,氨法的能量需求低于丙烷法。当比较两种输送压力时,发现在15bar下液化所需的能量少于7bar。最重要的是,这两种制冷剂都不适合在7bar下液化二氧化碳,因为它们的工作压力低于1atm。对几种优化方法进行了闭式循环液化设计试验。利用CO汽提塔的中压氨冷进行预冷,降低了闭式循环液化的净能耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信