Interpersonal Tension

Mahesh Gupta
{"title":"Interpersonal Tension","authors":"Mahesh Gupta","doi":"10.1177/0090552685163003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a theoretical explanation, in terms of a two-factor approach to a POX Situation, in an attempt to fill the void that exists in the face of the Heider-Newcomb controversy about POX balance. Both Heider's mathematicalformulafor balance criterion and Newcomb's three-category propositions regarding POX triads have been found untenable by the reported experimental research. Thisparadox is resolved by the two-factor approach, validity and parsimony of which is demonstrated by applying it to some of the POX data reported in earlier studies (see, for example, Jordan [1953], Rodrigues [1965], Aderman [1969], Gutman and Knox [1972], Insko et al. [19741).","PeriodicalId":285034,"journal":{"name":"Small Group Behavior","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Group Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0090552685163003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article offers a theoretical explanation, in terms of a two-factor approach to a POX Situation, in an attempt to fill the void that exists in the face of the Heider-Newcomb controversy about POX balance. Both Heider's mathematicalformulafor balance criterion and Newcomb's three-category propositions regarding POX triads have been found untenable by the reported experimental research. Thisparadox is resolved by the two-factor approach, validity and parsimony of which is demonstrated by applying it to some of the POX data reported in earlier studies (see, for example, Jordan [1953], Rodrigues [1965], Aderman [1969], Gutman and Knox [1972], Insko et al. [19741).
人际关系紧张
这篇文章提供了一个理论上的解释,在一个痘的情况下,一个双因素的方法,试图填补空白,存在于面对海德-纽科姆关于痘平衡的争议。Heider关于平衡准则的数学公式和Newcomb关于POX三元组的三范畴命题都被报道的实验研究发现是站不住脚的。这种悖论可以通过双因素方法解决,通过将其应用于早期研究中报告的一些POX数据(例如,参见Jordan [1953], Rodrigues [1965], Aderman [1969], Gutman和Knox [1972], Insko等人[19741]),可以证明其有效性和简约性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信