Development and Validation of Three Different UV Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of New Antifungal Combination Used in Treatment of External Fungal Infections and Their Comparison Using ANOVA

Ruchi Kansotia
{"title":"Development and Validation of Three Different UV Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of New Antifungal Combination Used in Treatment of External Fungal Infections and Their Comparison Using ANOVA","authors":"Ruchi Kansotia","doi":"10.23880/apct-16000188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Luliconazole and Terbinafine hydrochloride combination is used for external fungal infections and is newly introduced in market. Hence it is necessary to develop a appropriate method of analysis for rapid and accurate determination of these drugs. Three simple, sensitive, accurate, precise and economical UV-spectrophotometric methods (A,B,C) have been developed for simultaneous estimation of Luliconazole and Terbinafine hydrochloride in their pharmaceutical dosage form and their comparison by ANOVA. Method (A) is well based on first order derivative spectrophotometric method, in which zero crossing points for Luliconazole is 249.50 nm and Terbinafine hydrochloride is 258.50 nm. Linearity was found in range of 3-18 µg/ ml for both the drugs using methanol as a common solvent. Method (B) is constructed on the principle of dual wavelength method using absorbance difference at 281 and 306 nm for Luliconazole & 262 and 296 nm for Terbinafine hydrochloride. Method (C) is based on norm of Q-absorbance ratio method where iso-absorptive point was obtained at 250 nm and the λ max selected was of Terbinafine hydrochloride 282 nm. The developed methods were validated as per ICH guideline. Accuracy and precision of methods were determined and validated. All the developed methods showed good reproducibility and recovery with % RSD <2. These three methods developed were compared using one way ANOVA and the fcal value was found to be less than ftab value indicating that there is no significant difference in the assay results of the three methods. All three methods were found to be rapid, specific, precise and accurate and found no interferences from the cream excipients so it can be used for routine investigation of both drugs in quality control laboratories.","PeriodicalId":313915,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacology &amp; Clinical Trials","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacology &amp; Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/apct-16000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Luliconazole and Terbinafine hydrochloride combination is used for external fungal infections and is newly introduced in market. Hence it is necessary to develop a appropriate method of analysis for rapid and accurate determination of these drugs. Three simple, sensitive, accurate, precise and economical UV-spectrophotometric methods (A,B,C) have been developed for simultaneous estimation of Luliconazole and Terbinafine hydrochloride in their pharmaceutical dosage form and their comparison by ANOVA. Method (A) is well based on first order derivative spectrophotometric method, in which zero crossing points for Luliconazole is 249.50 nm and Terbinafine hydrochloride is 258.50 nm. Linearity was found in range of 3-18 µg/ ml for both the drugs using methanol as a common solvent. Method (B) is constructed on the principle of dual wavelength method using absorbance difference at 281 and 306 nm for Luliconazole & 262 and 296 nm for Terbinafine hydrochloride. Method (C) is based on norm of Q-absorbance ratio method where iso-absorptive point was obtained at 250 nm and the λ max selected was of Terbinafine hydrochloride 282 nm. The developed methods were validated as per ICH guideline. Accuracy and precision of methods were determined and validated. All the developed methods showed good reproducibility and recovery with % RSD <2. These three methods developed were compared using one way ANOVA and the fcal value was found to be less than ftab value indicating that there is no significant difference in the assay results of the three methods. All three methods were found to be rapid, specific, precise and accurate and found no interferences from the cream excipients so it can be used for routine investigation of both drugs in quality control laboratories.
三种不同紫外分光光度法测定体外真菌感染新复方抗真菌药物的建立与验证及其方差分析比较
吕立康唑联合盐酸特比萘芬用于治疗体外真菌感染,是新上市的药物。因此,有必要开发一种合适的分析方法来快速准确地测定这些药物。建立了三种简便、灵敏、准确、精密度高、经济的紫外分光光度法(A、B、C),用于同时测定卢立康唑和盐酸特比萘芬的药物剂型,并通过方差分析进行比较。方法(A)基于一阶导数分光光度法,卢立康唑的零点交叉点为249.50 nm,盐酸特比萘芬的零点交叉点为258.50 nm。两种药物在3 ~ 18µg/ ml范围内均呈线性关系。方法(B)基于双波长法原理构建,卢立康唑的吸光度差为281 nm和306 nm,盐酸特比萘芬的吸光度差为262 nm和296 nm。方法(C)基于q -吸光度比法规范,在250 nm处获得等吸收点,λ max选择为盐酸特比萘芬282 nm。根据ICH指南对所开发的方法进行了验证。对方法的准确度和精密度进行了测定和验证。所有方法均具有良好的重现性和回收率,RSD <2。采用单因素方差分析对三种方法进行比较,发现ftab值小于ftab值,表明三种方法的测定结果无显著差异。三种方法均具有快速、特异、精密度高、准确度高的特点,且不受乳膏辅料的干扰,可用于两种药物在质控实验室的常规检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信