{"title":"Pareto Evolution and Co-Evolution in Cognitive Neural Agents Synthesis for Tic-Tac-Toe","authors":"Y. J. Yau, J. Teo, P. Anthony","doi":"10.1109/CIG.2007.368113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a number of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been proposed over the last two decades, very few studies have utilized MOEAs for game agent synthesis. Recently, we have suggested a co-evolutionary implementation using the Pareto evolutionary programming (PEP) algorithm. This paper describes a series of experiments using PEP for evolving artificial neural networks (ANNs) that act as game-playing agents. Three systems are compared: (i) a canonical PEP system, (ii) a co-evolving PEP system (PCEP) with 3 different setups, and (iii) a co-evolving PEP system that uses an archive (PCEP-A) with 3 different setups. The aim of this study is to provide insights on the effects of including co-evolutionary techniques on a MOEA by investigating and comparing these 3 different approaches in evolving intelligent agents as both first and second players in a deterministic zero-sum board game. The results indicate that the canonical PEP system outperformed both co-evolutionary PEP systems as it was able to evolve ANN agents with higher quality game-playing performance as both first and second game players. Hence, this study shows that a canonical MOEA without co-evolution is desirable for the synthesis of cognitive game AI agents","PeriodicalId":365269,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2007.368113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Although a number of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been proposed over the last two decades, very few studies have utilized MOEAs for game agent synthesis. Recently, we have suggested a co-evolutionary implementation using the Pareto evolutionary programming (PEP) algorithm. This paper describes a series of experiments using PEP for evolving artificial neural networks (ANNs) that act as game-playing agents. Three systems are compared: (i) a canonical PEP system, (ii) a co-evolving PEP system (PCEP) with 3 different setups, and (iii) a co-evolving PEP system that uses an archive (PCEP-A) with 3 different setups. The aim of this study is to provide insights on the effects of including co-evolutionary techniques on a MOEA by investigating and comparing these 3 different approaches in evolving intelligent agents as both first and second players in a deterministic zero-sum board game. The results indicate that the canonical PEP system outperformed both co-evolutionary PEP systems as it was able to evolve ANN agents with higher quality game-playing performance as both first and second game players. Hence, this study shows that a canonical MOEA without co-evolution is desirable for the synthesis of cognitive game AI agents