Unique antithymocyte serum versus OKT3 for induction immunotherapy after heart transplantation.

The Journal of heart transplantation Pub Date : 1990-09-01
W H Frist, W H Merrill, T E Eastburn, J B Atkinson, J R Stewart, J W Hammon, J W Bender
{"title":"Unique antithymocyte serum versus OKT3 for induction immunotherapy after heart transplantation.","authors":"W H Frist,&nbsp;W H Merrill,&nbsp;T E Eastburn,&nbsp;J B Atkinson,&nbsp;J R Stewart,&nbsp;J W Hammon,&nbsp;J W Bender","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the efficacy of a unique polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte serum (ATS), we compared 17 consecutive nonrandomized heart transplant recipients (mean age, 38 +/- 15 years) given a 7-day prophylactic postoperative course of locally produced ATS (whole serum, no Freund's adjuvant, IV) with 19 patients (mean age, 42 +/- 17 years) given 14 days of monoclonal antibody OKT3. Cyclosporine, steroid, and azathioprine dosages were similar. At 30 days the event-free incidence of rejection was 66% +/- 11% for OKT3 (2.3 events/100 patient-days) versus 47% +/- 12% for ATS (1.2 events/100 patient-days). At 60 days and thereafter, however, there was no difference in overall number of cumulative rejection episodes. Overall infection rates were similar in both groups: the ATS group tended to have more bacterial infections, whereas the OKT3 group displayed more viral infections. Antiidiotypic antibodies developed in 29% of the ATS group and in 22% of the OKT3 group. This report demonstrates the efficacy of this polyclonal serum preparation made without Freund's adjuvant when used as an adjunct for induction-prophylactic immunotherapy in heart transplant recipients when compared with OKT3.</p>","PeriodicalId":77638,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of heart transplantation","volume":"9 5","pages":"489-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of heart transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of a unique polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte serum (ATS), we compared 17 consecutive nonrandomized heart transplant recipients (mean age, 38 +/- 15 years) given a 7-day prophylactic postoperative course of locally produced ATS (whole serum, no Freund's adjuvant, IV) with 19 patients (mean age, 42 +/- 17 years) given 14 days of monoclonal antibody OKT3. Cyclosporine, steroid, and azathioprine dosages were similar. At 30 days the event-free incidence of rejection was 66% +/- 11% for OKT3 (2.3 events/100 patient-days) versus 47% +/- 12% for ATS (1.2 events/100 patient-days). At 60 days and thereafter, however, there was no difference in overall number of cumulative rejection episodes. Overall infection rates were similar in both groups: the ATS group tended to have more bacterial infections, whereas the OKT3 group displayed more viral infections. Antiidiotypic antibodies developed in 29% of the ATS group and in 22% of the OKT3 group. This report demonstrates the efficacy of this polyclonal serum preparation made without Freund's adjuvant when used as an adjunct for induction-prophylactic immunotherapy in heart transplant recipients when compared with OKT3.

独特的抗胸腺细胞血清与OKT3在心脏移植后诱导免疫治疗中的作用。
为了确定一种独特的多克隆兔抗胸腺细胞血清(ATS)的疗效,我们比较了17名连续的非随机心脏移植受者(平均年龄38 +/- 15岁)给予7天的局部生产ATS(全血清,不含弗氏佐剂,IV)和19名患者(平均年龄42 +/- 17岁)给予14天的单克隆抗体OKT3。环孢素、类固醇和硫唑嘌呤的剂量相似。30天无事件排斥反应发生率OKT3为66% +/- 11%(2.3事件/100患者日),ATS为47% +/- 12%(1.2事件/100患者日)。然而,在60天及之后,累积排斥事件的总次数没有差异。两组的总体感染率相似:ATS组往往有更多的细菌感染,而OKT3组则有更多的病毒感染。29%的ATS组和22%的OKT3组产生了抗独特型抗体。本报告证明,与OKT3相比,这种不含Freund佐剂的多克隆血清制剂用于心脏移植受者诱导预防免疫治疗的辅助治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信