Stock-Market Law and the Accuracy of Public Companies' Stock Prices

Kevin S. Haeberle
{"title":"Stock-Market Law and the Accuracy of Public Companies' Stock Prices","authors":"Kevin S. Haeberle","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2410422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social benefits of more accurate stock prices — that is, stock-market prices that more accurately reflect the future cash flows that companies are likely to produce — are well established. But it is also thought that market forces alone will lead to only a sub-optimal level of stock-price accuracy — a level that fails to obtain the maximum net social benefits, or wealth, that would result from a higher level. One of the principal aims of federal securities law has therefore been to increase the extent to which the stock prices of the most important companies in our economy (public companies) contain information about firms’ prospects so that society generates more wealth. Indeed, enhancing the accuracy of these prices in this way is perhaps the primary justification for the corporate disclosure, fraud, and insider-trading rules that make up the traditional core of federal securities law. Yet, important price-accuracy effects of a distinct area of the field (the law governing the market in which stocks are traded) have been overlooked.This Article theorizes that a set of central, yet little-noticed, stock-market rules is resulting in society producing a lower level of stock-price accuracy than it otherwise might. The Article therefore provides examples of ways in which the laws governing stock trading can be altered to increase stock-price accuracy. And it urges regulators to consider whether such alternations might be socially desirable in one of two ways: by enhancing the current level of stock-price accuracy in a manner that results in net social benefits, or by providing society with a lower-cost means than those associated with existing disclosure, fraud, and insider-trading laws for obtaining that current level. Accordingly, the Article theorizes that regulators have a fourth main securities-law tool (stock-market law) for increasing the accuracy of public companies’ stock prices, and sets forth a cost-benefit framework to help them determine whether it can be used to achieve one of the chief goals of securities law: obtaining a socially optimal level of stock-price accuracy.","PeriodicalId":130177,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2410422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The social benefits of more accurate stock prices — that is, stock-market prices that more accurately reflect the future cash flows that companies are likely to produce — are well established. But it is also thought that market forces alone will lead to only a sub-optimal level of stock-price accuracy — a level that fails to obtain the maximum net social benefits, or wealth, that would result from a higher level. One of the principal aims of federal securities law has therefore been to increase the extent to which the stock prices of the most important companies in our economy (public companies) contain information about firms’ prospects so that society generates more wealth. Indeed, enhancing the accuracy of these prices in this way is perhaps the primary justification for the corporate disclosure, fraud, and insider-trading rules that make up the traditional core of federal securities law. Yet, important price-accuracy effects of a distinct area of the field (the law governing the market in which stocks are traded) have been overlooked.This Article theorizes that a set of central, yet little-noticed, stock-market rules is resulting in society producing a lower level of stock-price accuracy than it otherwise might. The Article therefore provides examples of ways in which the laws governing stock trading can be altered to increase stock-price accuracy. And it urges regulators to consider whether such alternations might be socially desirable in one of two ways: by enhancing the current level of stock-price accuracy in a manner that results in net social benefits, or by providing society with a lower-cost means than those associated with existing disclosure, fraud, and insider-trading laws for obtaining that current level. Accordingly, the Article theorizes that regulators have a fourth main securities-law tool (stock-market law) for increasing the accuracy of public companies’ stock prices, and sets forth a cost-benefit framework to help them determine whether it can be used to achieve one of the chief goals of securities law: obtaining a socially optimal level of stock-price accuracy.
证券市场法与上市公司股票价格的准确性
更准确的股票价格——即更准确地反映公司可能产生的未来现金流的股票市场价格——的社会效益是公认的。但也有人认为,单凭市场力量只能导致股价准确性达到次优水平——这种水平无法获得更高水平所能带来的最大净社会效益或财富。因此,联邦证券法的主要目的之一是增加我们经济中最重要公司(上市公司)的股价包含有关公司前景信息的程度,以便社会创造更多财富。事实上,以这种方式提高这些价格的准确性可能是构成联邦证券法传统核心的公司披露、欺诈和内幕交易规则的主要理由。然而,该领域的一个独特领域(股票交易市场的法则)的重要价格准确性效应却被忽视了。这篇文章的理论是,一套核心的、但很少被注意到的股市规则,导致社会产生的股票价格准确性低于正常情况下可能产生的水平。因此,该条款提供了一些例子,说明如何修改股票交易的法律,以提高股价的准确性。它敦促监管机构考虑这样的替代方案是否在以下两种方式中有一种可能是社会所希望的:以一种能带来净社会效益的方式提高当前的股价准确性水平,或者为社会提供一种比现有的披露、欺诈和内幕交易法更低成本的手段来获得当前水平。因此,本文认为监管者有第四个主要的证券法工具(股票市场法)来提高上市公司股票价格的准确性,并提出了一个成本效益框架,以帮助他们确定是否可以用来实现证券法的主要目标之一:获得社会最优的股票价格准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信