Is There Gender Disparity in Orthopedic Surgery Resident Research Productivity?

Bridget K. Ellsworth, Nicolas Pascual-Leone, Preston W. Gross, Kathryn A. Barth, Shevaun M. Doyle
{"title":"Is There Gender Disparity in Orthopedic Surgery Resident Research Productivity?","authors":"Bridget K. Ellsworth, Nicolas Pascual-Leone, Preston W. Gross, Kathryn A. Barth, Shevaun M. Doyle","doi":"10.1177/15563316221150934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compared with male senior authors, female senior authors publish less often in orthopedic journals than expected based on their population proportion. It is unknown whether this trend is also present among orthopedic trainees. Purpose: We sought to determine whether there is a gender discrepancy in the publication volume and authorship status among orthopedic residents. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the research productivity of male and female orthopedic residents. The top 10 ranked US orthopedic surgery residencies by research output in 2021–2022 were obtained from Doximity. Residents’ names were recorded from each institution’s residency website. We classified each resident as male or female, searched on PubMed, and recorded the number of publications relevant to orthopedic surgery. Resident contribution to each publication was recorded as either a first/last author or a middle author. To assess contributions by postgraduate year, we compared male and female junior residents (PGY1-3) and senior residents (PGY4-5) using the number of total publications, middle author publications, first/last author publications, and the difference between the number of middle and first/last author publications. Results: Among the 335 male and 117 female residents included, male residents had more total publications than female residents. Among PGY4-5, male residents had more total publications and middle author publications. There was no difference in the number of first/last author publications between male and female PGY4-5 residents. Conclusions: Our cross-sectional analysis found that in the 2021–2022 academic year, male orthopedic surgery residents published more often than female residents, although among PGY4-5 residents, we found no gender differences in number of first/last author publications. The difference in total publications among PGY4-5 residents is likely due to differences in middle author publications. Future research should consider residents’ self-identified gender, including non-binary and gender-fluid identity.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316221150934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compared with male senior authors, female senior authors publish less often in orthopedic journals than expected based on their population proportion. It is unknown whether this trend is also present among orthopedic trainees. Purpose: We sought to determine whether there is a gender discrepancy in the publication volume and authorship status among orthopedic residents. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the research productivity of male and female orthopedic residents. The top 10 ranked US orthopedic surgery residencies by research output in 2021–2022 were obtained from Doximity. Residents’ names were recorded from each institution’s residency website. We classified each resident as male or female, searched on PubMed, and recorded the number of publications relevant to orthopedic surgery. Resident contribution to each publication was recorded as either a first/last author or a middle author. To assess contributions by postgraduate year, we compared male and female junior residents (PGY1-3) and senior residents (PGY4-5) using the number of total publications, middle author publications, first/last author publications, and the difference between the number of middle and first/last author publications. Results: Among the 335 male and 117 female residents included, male residents had more total publications than female residents. Among PGY4-5, male residents had more total publications and middle author publications. There was no difference in the number of first/last author publications between male and female PGY4-5 residents. Conclusions: Our cross-sectional analysis found that in the 2021–2022 academic year, male orthopedic surgery residents published more often than female residents, although among PGY4-5 residents, we found no gender differences in number of first/last author publications. The difference in total publications among PGY4-5 residents is likely due to differences in middle author publications. Future research should consider residents’ self-identified gender, including non-binary and gender-fluid identity.
骨科住院医师科研效率存在性别差异吗?
背景:与男性资深作者相比,女性资深作者在骨科期刊上的发表次数低于其人口比例预期。目前尚不清楚这种趋势是否也存在于骨科实习生中。目的:我们试图确定骨科住院医师在出版物数量和作者地位方面是否存在性别差异。方法:采用横断面分析对骨科住院医师的研究效率进行评估。2021-2022年美国骨科住院医师研究产出排名前10位的数据来自docximity。居民的名字从每个机构的居住网站上记录下来。我们将每位住院医师分类为男性或女性,在PubMed上进行检索,并记录与骨科手术相关的出版物数量。对每份出版物的常驻贡献被记录为第一/最后作者或中间作者。为了评估研究生年度的贡献,我们比较了男性和女性初级住院医师(PGY1-3)和高级住院医师(PGY4-5),使用了总发表论文数量、中间作者发表论文数量、第一/最后作者发表论文数量以及中间和第一/最后作者发表论文数量的差异。结果:在335名男性居民和117名女性居民中,男性居民的出版物总量高于女性居民。在PGY4-5中,男性居民的总发表量和中间作者发表量均高于男性居民。在PGY4-5的男性和女性居民之间,第一/最后作者出版物的数量没有差异。结论:我们的横断面分析发现,在2021-2022学年,男性骨科住院医生发表论文的频率高于女性住院医生,尽管在PGY4-5住院医生中,我们发现第一/最后作者发表论文的数量没有性别差异。PGY4-5居民的总出版物的差异可能是由于中间作者出版物的差异。未来的研究应考虑居民自我认同的性别,包括非二元认同和性别流动认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信