New Challenges

{"title":"New Challenges","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvzcz3n5.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economists and diplomats are different specimen. For long they could neglect each other’s existence. Typically economic and commercial policies were labelled ‘low politics’ by statesmen and diplomats. At first sight the tough dynamic world of commerce and the subtle glamour of diplomacy do not have much in common, but as any newspaper reader knows, international economic relationships are an important factor in the diplomatic sphere of influence and vice versa. ‘No matter who reigns, the merchant reigns.’ ‘Trade follows the flag.’ This book takes a closer look at international economics and politics. Economic diplomacy (of which commercial policy is an important element) is at the interface between these subject fields as its aim is to influence decisions about cross-border economic activities (export, import, investment, lending, aid and migration) pursued by governments and nonstate actors. A closer study of the interrelationships between, on the one hand, diplomacy and politics and, on the other hand, trade, investment and capital is warranted from a broader theoretical perspective. Mainstream neoclassical economic theory typically tends to pay little if any attention to public policy in the context of bilateral economic relationships. This is an undesirable situation and one can only agree with Bhagwati (1991, p. xvi) when he complains ‘How can we possibly explain what happens unless we bring in the political equations into our modelling at the same time?’ The lack of attention may be due to the fact that the economic recipe is to specialize according to comparative advantage and to avoid subsidies and other distorting government policies that reduce welfare. Indeed, most textbooks in international economics do not pay attention to the inherent political character of international economic exchange. A case in point is Ricardo’s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation ([1817] 1962, para. 7.1) which develops the theory of comparative advantage as an explanation for the ‘natural trade’ that leads Portugal to export wine and England to export cloth:","PeriodicalId":225624,"journal":{"name":"Searching for Aunt Dot","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Searching for Aunt Dot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzcz3n5.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economists and diplomats are different specimen. For long they could neglect each other’s existence. Typically economic and commercial policies were labelled ‘low politics’ by statesmen and diplomats. At first sight the tough dynamic world of commerce and the subtle glamour of diplomacy do not have much in common, but as any newspaper reader knows, international economic relationships are an important factor in the diplomatic sphere of influence and vice versa. ‘No matter who reigns, the merchant reigns.’ ‘Trade follows the flag.’ This book takes a closer look at international economics and politics. Economic diplomacy (of which commercial policy is an important element) is at the interface between these subject fields as its aim is to influence decisions about cross-border economic activities (export, import, investment, lending, aid and migration) pursued by governments and nonstate actors. A closer study of the interrelationships between, on the one hand, diplomacy and politics and, on the other hand, trade, investment and capital is warranted from a broader theoretical perspective. Mainstream neoclassical economic theory typically tends to pay little if any attention to public policy in the context of bilateral economic relationships. This is an undesirable situation and one can only agree with Bhagwati (1991, p. xvi) when he complains ‘How can we possibly explain what happens unless we bring in the political equations into our modelling at the same time?’ The lack of attention may be due to the fact that the economic recipe is to specialize according to comparative advantage and to avoid subsidies and other distorting government policies that reduce welfare. Indeed, most textbooks in international economics do not pay attention to the inherent political character of international economic exchange. A case in point is Ricardo’s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation ([1817] 1962, para. 7.1) which develops the theory of comparative advantage as an explanation for the ‘natural trade’ that leads Portugal to export wine and England to export cloth:
新的挑战
经济学家和外交官是不同的样本。在很长一段时间里,他们可以忽略彼此的存在。通常,经济和商业政策被政治家和外交官称为“低级政治”。乍一看,充满活力的商业世界与微妙的外交魅力没有多少共同之处,但任何读报纸的人都知道,国际经济关系是外交势力范围中的一个重要因素,反之亦然。“不管是谁统治,都是商人统治。“贸易跟着国旗走。”这本书对国际经济和政治进行了更深入的研究。经济外交(其中商业政策是一个重要因素)处于这些主题领域之间的界面,因为其目的是影响政府和非国家行为体所从事的跨境经济活动(出口、进口、投资、贷款、援助和移民)的决策。有必要从更广泛的理论角度对外交和政治以及贸易、投资和资本之间的相互关系进行更密切的研究。主流的新古典经济理论通常倾向于很少关注双边经济关系背景下的公共政策。这是一种不受欢迎的情况,人们只能同意Bhagwati (1991, p. xvi)的抱怨,“除非我们同时将政治方程引入我们的模型,否则我们怎么可能解释发生了什么?”缺乏关注可能是由于这样一个事实,即经济处方是根据比较优势进行专业化,并避免补贴和其他扭曲的政府政策,这些政策会减少福利。事实上,大多数国际经济学教科书都没有注意到国际经济交流的内在政治特征。一个恰当的例子是李嘉图的《政治经济学和税收原理》([1817]1962,第18段)。7.1),它发展了比较优势理论,作为导致葡萄牙出口葡萄酒和英国出口布料的“自然贸易”的解释;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信