A Comparative Study of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing of Episiotomy

A. Garg, N. Garg, M. Agrawal, N. Garg
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing of Episiotomy","authors":"A. Garg, N. Garg, M. Agrawal, N. Garg","doi":"10.37506/IJOCS.V8I2.2577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of convention repair of episiotomy has come under scrutiny in recent years.This procedure has nowbeen modified from interrupted suturing earlier to continuous stitching of episiotomy.Aim &objectives :-This study was done to evaluate the patient comfort & post-op complications betweenconventional repair & continuous repair of episiotomy .Methodology:-This prospective study was conducted in the department of Gyne & obstr of Rama medicalcollege, Hapur from July 2018 to June 2019 on 200 patients who were randomly divided into two groupsof 100 patients each . In Group A (study group), episiotomy repair was performed by continuous stitching &group B underwent conventional interrupted suturing repair. Post operatively the efficacy of both proceduresanalysed on the basis of outcome in form of pain & other complications.Result :- Majority of patients of episiotomy were in age group of 18 to 26 years. Mean gestational periodwas 38.4+0.6 & 38.4+0.5 for the study & control group. The mean suturing time was also significantlyshorter for study group.Pain score was significantly less after 48 hrs. Resumption of sexual activity wassignificantly shorter in study group.Conclusion :- The success rate was significantly better in continuous repair group in the form of lessprocedure time, suture material , postpartum pain & early resumption of sexual activity","PeriodicalId":113416,"journal":{"name":"International journal of contemporary surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of contemporary surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/IJOCS.V8I2.2577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of convention repair of episiotomy has come under scrutiny in recent years.This procedure has nowbeen modified from interrupted suturing earlier to continuous stitching of episiotomy.Aim &objectives :-This study was done to evaluate the patient comfort & post-op complications betweenconventional repair & continuous repair of episiotomy .Methodology:-This prospective study was conducted in the department of Gyne & obstr of Rama medicalcollege, Hapur from July 2018 to June 2019 on 200 patients who were randomly divided into two groupsof 100 patients each . In Group A (study group), episiotomy repair was performed by continuous stitching &group B underwent conventional interrupted suturing repair. Post operatively the efficacy of both proceduresanalysed on the basis of outcome in form of pain & other complications.Result :- Majority of patients of episiotomy were in age group of 18 to 26 years. Mean gestational periodwas 38.4+0.6 & 38.4+0.5 for the study & control group. The mean suturing time was also significantlyshorter for study group.Pain score was significantly less after 48 hrs. Resumption of sexual activity wassignificantly shorter in study group.Conclusion :- The success rate was significantly better in continuous repair group in the form of lessprocedure time, suture material , postpartum pain & early resumption of sexual activity
会阴切开连续缝合与间断缝合的比较研究
近年来,会阴切开术常规修复的作用一直受到人们的关注。这种方法现在已经从早期的间断缝合改进为会阴切开的连续缝合。目的和目的:本研究旨在评估会阴切开术常规修复与持续修复患者的舒适度和术后并发症。方法:本前瞻性研究于2018年7月至2019年6月在哈普尔拉玛医学院妇产科进行,200例患者随机分为两组,每组100例。A组(研究组)采用会阴切口连续缝合修复术,B组采用常规间断缝合修复术。根据术后疼痛和其他并发症的结果分析两种方法的疗效。结果:外阴切开术患者以18 ~ 26岁年龄组居多。研究组和对照组的平均妊娠期分别为38.4+0.6和38.4+0.5。研究组的平均缝合时间也明显缩短。48小时后疼痛评分明显降低。研究组恢复性活动的时间明显较短。结论:连续修复组手术时间短,缝线材料少,产后疼痛少,恢复性生活早,成功率明显高于连续修复组
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信