Two versus five bilateral local anesthetic injections for submucosal resection: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

Z. Naja, S. Kanawati, A. Naja, F. Ziade
{"title":"Two versus five bilateral local anesthetic injections for submucosal resection: a randomized double-blind clinical trial","authors":"Z. Naja, S. Kanawati, A. Naja, F. Ziade","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_88_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Submucous resection (SMR) is performed under general anesthesia, local anesthesia, or a combination of both. The combination was associated with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of two versus five bilateral local anesthetic injections in terms of postoperative pain relief at 24 h postoperatively. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a tertiary care center between May 2015 and December 2016. Patients aged between 15 and 63 years scheduled for elective SMR of the nasal septum were included. Eligible patients received general anesthesia and were randomly assigned to receive either two or five bilateral local anesthetic injections. The primary outcome was pain assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale. Other outcomes were hemodynamic stability, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting, as well as patient’s and surgeon’s satisfaction. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study and were divided equally into the two groups. Both groups were similar in terms of age, height, weight, surgery duration, and hemodynamic characteristics. There was no significant difference for both groups in pain scores at 24 h (1.53±1.25 vs. 2.07±1.82, P=0.069 for two vs. five injections, respectively) and over the 10 postoperative days. Similarly, the number of patients who consumed analgesics was similar between the two groups. Conclusion The present study revealed that two bilateral local anesthetic injections at the suprazygomatic and infraorbital areas could be an alternative to five injections in patients undergoing SMR.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_88_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Submucous resection (SMR) is performed under general anesthesia, local anesthesia, or a combination of both. The combination was associated with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of two versus five bilateral local anesthetic injections in terms of postoperative pain relief at 24 h postoperatively. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a tertiary care center between May 2015 and December 2016. Patients aged between 15 and 63 years scheduled for elective SMR of the nasal septum were included. Eligible patients received general anesthesia and were randomly assigned to receive either two or five bilateral local anesthetic injections. The primary outcome was pain assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale. Other outcomes were hemodynamic stability, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting, as well as patient’s and surgeon’s satisfaction. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study and were divided equally into the two groups. Both groups were similar in terms of age, height, weight, surgery duration, and hemodynamic characteristics. There was no significant difference for both groups in pain scores at 24 h (1.53±1.25 vs. 2.07±1.82, P=0.069 for two vs. five injections, respectively) and over the 10 postoperative days. Similarly, the number of patients who consumed analgesics was similar between the two groups. Conclusion The present study revealed that two bilateral local anesthetic injections at the suprazygomatic and infraorbital areas could be an alternative to five injections in patients undergoing SMR.
2对5双侧局部麻醉注射粘膜下切除术:一项随机双盲临床试验
背景:粘膜下切除术(SMR)是在全身麻醉、局部麻醉或两者联合麻醉下进行的。联合用药可减少术后疼痛,缩短住院时间。本临床试验的目的是比较2次和5次双侧局麻注射在术后24小时疼痛缓解方面的有效性。这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验,于2015年5月至2016年12月在一家三级医疗中心进行。年龄在15至63岁之间的患者计划择期鼻中隔SMR。符合条件的患者接受全身麻醉,并随机分配接受两次或五次双侧局部麻醉注射。主要结果是用数值评定量表评估疼痛。其他结果包括血流动力学稳定性、镇痛药消耗、恶心和呕吐以及患者和外科医生的满意度。结果共纳入120例患者,随机分为两组。两组患者的年龄、身高、体重、手术时间和血流动力学特征相似。两组患者24 h疼痛评分(1.53±1.25比2.07±1.82,2次注射比5次注射P=0.069)和术后10 d疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。同样,两组服用镇痛药的患者数量相似。结论在颧上区和眶下区进行两次双侧局麻药注射可以替代5次局部麻药注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信