Validity of PET studies in brain tumors.

K Herholz, K Wienhard, W D Heiss
{"title":"Validity of PET studies in brain tumors.","authors":"K Herholz,&nbsp;K Wienhard,&nbsp;W D Heiss","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positron emission tomography (PET) in human brain tumors presents specific problems, such as tissue inhomogeneity and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), that are not present or at least not that important in normal brain. In addition, tracer metabolism may be different from normal brain. Mathematical arguments demonstrate that quantitation in inhomogeneous tissue is extremely difficult with tracers undergoing reversible metabolism, whereas irreversible metabolic steps can be quantified more easily. Even for metabolically inert tracers with reversible transport across the BBB, physiological identification of transport rate constants may be ambiguous, since diffusion processes within the tissue cannot be differentiated from slow transport components at the BBB. Mathematical analysis shows that transport is usually underestimated, whereas metabolism is usually overestimated in inhomogeneous tumor tissue. For accurate measurements of blood flow and BBB permeability, use of short measurement times is recommended. Measurements of tumor glucose consumption with [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) are probably only little affected by tumor heterogeneity. There are, however, major problems caused by variation of the lumped constant, which relates the kinetics of FDG to those of glucose. Most experimental data indicate a considerable increase of the lumped constant in malignant tumors, resulting in overestimation of glucose metabolism if the standard value is used. In spite of these limitations, measurements of glucose metabolism with FDG are useful clinically to evaluate the prognosis of patients with brain tumors and to differentiate between late radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor. New tracers for measurement of protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and uptake of cytostatic drugs are of high clinical interest. As yet, little is known about the contribution of metabolites in brain and plasma to measured tissue activity, and differentiation between transport at the BBB and metabolism may be difficult. Therefore, the basis for accurate quantitation with these new compounds is still incomplete. Clinical reports suggest that some amino acid tracers can be used for localization and grading of brain tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9739,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","volume":"2 3","pages":"240-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) in human brain tumors presents specific problems, such as tissue inhomogeneity and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), that are not present or at least not that important in normal brain. In addition, tracer metabolism may be different from normal brain. Mathematical arguments demonstrate that quantitation in inhomogeneous tissue is extremely difficult with tracers undergoing reversible metabolism, whereas irreversible metabolic steps can be quantified more easily. Even for metabolically inert tracers with reversible transport across the BBB, physiological identification of transport rate constants may be ambiguous, since diffusion processes within the tissue cannot be differentiated from slow transport components at the BBB. Mathematical analysis shows that transport is usually underestimated, whereas metabolism is usually overestimated in inhomogeneous tumor tissue. For accurate measurements of blood flow and BBB permeability, use of short measurement times is recommended. Measurements of tumor glucose consumption with [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) are probably only little affected by tumor heterogeneity. There are, however, major problems caused by variation of the lumped constant, which relates the kinetics of FDG to those of glucose. Most experimental data indicate a considerable increase of the lumped constant in malignant tumors, resulting in overestimation of glucose metabolism if the standard value is used. In spite of these limitations, measurements of glucose metabolism with FDG are useful clinically to evaluate the prognosis of patients with brain tumors and to differentiate between late radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor. New tracers for measurement of protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and uptake of cytostatic drugs are of high clinical interest. As yet, little is known about the contribution of metabolites in brain and plasma to measured tissue activity, and differentiation between transport at the BBB and metabolism may be difficult. Therefore, the basis for accurate quantitation with these new compounds is still incomplete. Clinical reports suggest that some amino acid tracers can be used for localization and grading of brain tumors.

PET研究在脑肿瘤中的有效性。
人类脑肿瘤的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)呈现出特定的问题,如组织不均匀性和血脑屏障(BBB)的破坏,这些在正常大脑中不存在或至少不那么重要。此外,示踪剂代谢可能与正常大脑不同。数学论证表明,在非均质组织中进行定量是极其困难的,示踪剂经历可逆代谢,而不可逆代谢步骤可以更容易地量化。即使是代谢惰性的示踪剂,通过血脑屏障进行可逆的运输,由于组织内的扩散过程不能与血脑屏障的缓慢运输组分区分开来,因此运输速率常数的生理鉴定可能是模糊的。数学分析表明,在不均匀的肿瘤组织中,转运通常被低估,而代谢通常被高估。为了准确测量血流量和血脑屏障通透性,建议使用短测量时间。用[18F]2-氟-2-脱氧-d -葡萄糖(FDG)测量肿瘤葡萄糖消耗可能只受肿瘤异质性的影响很小。然而,集中常数的变化引起了主要的问题,它将FDG的动力学与葡萄糖的动力学联系起来。大多数实验数据表明,在恶性肿瘤中,集总常数有相当大的增加,如果使用标准值,会导致对葡萄糖代谢的高估。尽管存在这些局限性,用FDG测量葡萄糖代谢在临床上对评估脑肿瘤患者的预后和区分晚期放射坏死和复发肿瘤是有用的。用于测量蛋白质合成、细胞增殖和细胞抑制药物摄取的新型示踪剂具有很高的临床价值。到目前为止,关于脑和血浆中代谢物对测量组织活性的贡献知之甚少,并且血脑屏障运输和代谢之间的区分可能很困难。因此,对这些新化合物进行精确定量的基础仍然不完整。临床报告表明,一些氨基酸示踪剂可用于脑肿瘤的定位和分级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信