Agile Enterprise Transformations: Surveying the Many Facets of Agility for the Hybrid Era

Petri Kettunen, Tomas Gustavsson, M. Laanti, Andreas Tjernsten, T. Mikkonen, T. Männistö
{"title":"Agile Enterprise Transformations: Surveying the Many Facets of Agility for the Hybrid Era","authors":"Petri Kettunen, Tomas Gustavsson, M. Laanti, Andreas Tjernsten, T. Mikkonen, T. Männistö","doi":"10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile companies are not uniform. Consequently, agile transformations are conceived broadly, ranging from adopting agile methods and practices in software development teams or functions to building all-encompassing enterprise agility. Moreover, the targeted effects of agility may vary, and the success of transformations and the attainment of agility are measured in various ways. In this paper, based on a recent industrial survey study, we scrutinize holistically why companies want to transform, what types of agility they are aiming at, and how they gauge transformations. The survey data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Most of the respondents were in large or very large companies in Finland and Sweden in diverse industry domains. The main findings indicate that there are many reasons for companies to transform both to improve external outcomes (fore mostly responsiveness) and to develop internal capabilities (adaptability, organizational learning). Companies seemed to have aims and goals with respect to all types of agility, including business agility. As the nature of transformations and the companies’ aims and goals vary, the transformations follow various means and measures. As a conclusion, for the hybrid era, we advise companies to consider how agility has benefited during the pandemic era, how hybrid work possibly affects the goals for agile transformations and the different facets of agility, and how to sustain agility in hybrid work.","PeriodicalId":269970,"journal":{"name":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agile companies are not uniform. Consequently, agile transformations are conceived broadly, ranging from adopting agile methods and practices in software development teams or functions to building all-encompassing enterprise agility. Moreover, the targeted effects of agility may vary, and the success of transformations and the attainment of agility are measured in various ways. In this paper, based on a recent industrial survey study, we scrutinize holistically why companies want to transform, what types of agility they are aiming at, and how they gauge transformations. The survey data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Most of the respondents were in large or very large companies in Finland and Sweden in diverse industry domains. The main findings indicate that there are many reasons for companies to transform both to improve external outcomes (fore mostly responsiveness) and to develop internal capabilities (adaptability, organizational learning). Companies seemed to have aims and goals with respect to all types of agility, including business agility. As the nature of transformations and the companies’ aims and goals vary, the transformations follow various means and measures. As a conclusion, for the hybrid era, we advise companies to consider how agility has benefited during the pandemic era, how hybrid work possibly affects the goals for agile transformations and the different facets of agility, and how to sustain agility in hybrid work.
敏捷企业转型:考察混合时代敏捷性的许多方面
敏捷公司不是统一的。因此,敏捷转换的概念非常广泛,从在软件开发团队或功能中采用敏捷方法和实践,到构建无所不包的企业敏捷性。此外,敏捷性的目标效果可能是不同的,并且转换的成功和敏捷性的实现是用不同的方式来衡量的。在本文中,基于最近的一项工业调查研究,我们全面地审视了公司为什么想要转型,他们的目标是什么类型的敏捷性,以及他们如何衡量转型。调查数据是在2020年COVID-19大流行期间收集的。大多数受访者就职于芬兰和瑞典不同行业领域的大型或超大型公司。主要研究结果表明,企业转型的原因有很多,既可以改善外部结果(最重要的是响应能力),也可以发展内部能力(适应性、组织学习)。公司似乎对所有类型的敏捷性(包括业务敏捷性)都有目的和目标。由于转换的性质和公司的目的和目标各不相同,转换采用不同的手段和措施。作为结论,对于混合时代,我们建议公司考虑在大流行时代敏捷性是如何受益的,混合工作如何可能影响敏捷转型的目标和敏捷性的不同方面,以及如何在混合工作中保持敏捷性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信