Risk Informed Design modeling process & design team - Analyst interaction

C. Mattenberger
{"title":"Risk Informed Design modeling process & design team - Analyst interaction","authors":"C. Mattenberger","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5447997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As demand for highly reliable complex systems increases, engineers are being forced to consider the risk implications of design decisions earlier in the conceptual phase of projects and with greater accuracy. Standard probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) usually employed to verify that a product meets requirements are too resource intensive and too slow to keep up with the speed at which the design is maturing; while classical qualitative methods do not provide the level of detail and granularity required by the designers to make high-quality risk informed decisions. The Altair design team was able to overcome these challenges by employing a process of Risk Informed Design utilizing the Valador Reliability Tool [1] (VRT). This tool is able to quickly and accurately produce estimates of the risk of Loss of Mission (LOM) and Loss of Crew (LOC) per mission and provide insight to the designers as to how their decisions will impact overall mission success. The VRT employs a method or risk assessment that is unlike traditional PRA as it effectively engages the designers in the model building process and as a result of this increased Designer - Analyst interaction both the quality of the design and the quality of the PRA model is increased.","PeriodicalId":299782,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5447997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

As demand for highly reliable complex systems increases, engineers are being forced to consider the risk implications of design decisions earlier in the conceptual phase of projects and with greater accuracy. Standard probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) usually employed to verify that a product meets requirements are too resource intensive and too slow to keep up with the speed at which the design is maturing; while classical qualitative methods do not provide the level of detail and granularity required by the designers to make high-quality risk informed decisions. The Altair design team was able to overcome these challenges by employing a process of Risk Informed Design utilizing the Valador Reliability Tool [1] (VRT). This tool is able to quickly and accurately produce estimates of the risk of Loss of Mission (LOM) and Loss of Crew (LOC) per mission and provide insight to the designers as to how their decisions will impact overall mission success. The VRT employs a method or risk assessment that is unlike traditional PRA as it effectively engages the designers in the model building process and as a result of this increased Designer - Analyst interaction both the quality of the design and the quality of the PRA model is increased.
风险知情设计建模过程和设计团队-分析师的互动
随着对高度可靠的复杂系统需求的增加,工程师们被迫在项目的概念阶段更早地考虑设计决策的风险含义,并且更加准确。通常用于验证产品是否满足要求的标准概率风险评估(PRA)过于资源密集,速度太慢,无法跟上设计成熟的速度;而经典的定性方法并不能提供设计师做出高质量风险决策所需的细节和粒度。Altair设计团队利用Valador可靠性工具[1](VRT),采用风险知情设计(Risk Informed design)流程,克服了这些挑战。该工具能够快速准确地估算每次任务的任务损失(LOM)和人员损失(LOC)风险,并为设计师提供他们的决策将如何影响整体任务成功的洞察力。VRT采用了一种不同于传统PRA的方法或风险评估,因为它有效地让设计师参与到模型构建过程中,并且由于增加了设计师-分析师的互动,设计的质量和PRA模型的质量都得到了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信