“Smarterized” urban project process with living lab approach: Exploration through a case study

Jonathan Lacroix, L. Dupont, C. Guidat
{"title":"“Smarterized” urban project process with living lab approach: Exploration through a case study","authors":"Jonathan Lacroix, L. Dupont, C. Guidat","doi":"10.1109/ICE.2017.8279939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explore the relation between urban project practices in peri-urban context and innovative ways to develop solutions. Urban project process imposes linear and sequenced engineering framework and regulates stakeholder's links by a regulatory actor's polarization. However, it does not generate innovative solutions linking local and global stakes. Here, starting by a theorical field of urban project and innovation studying, we improve first observations from a qualitative research approach with 51 various regional urban project stakeholders within 4 Focus Groups. This exploratory study provides basis about urban project process and Living Lab interactions and gives a better understanding of the professional context. Based on these findings, we summarize that specific innovation management gives means to allow renew practices in urban project process. Living Lab implementation can generate an open-innovated and collaborative environment centred on “Use”. It gives the design sense to improve solution appropriation by finals users. Also, it allows large stakeholders mobilization to produce, capitalize and distribute “Uses”, as language and knowledge.","PeriodicalId":421648,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper explore the relation between urban project practices in peri-urban context and innovative ways to develop solutions. Urban project process imposes linear and sequenced engineering framework and regulates stakeholder's links by a regulatory actor's polarization. However, it does not generate innovative solutions linking local and global stakes. Here, starting by a theorical field of urban project and innovation studying, we improve first observations from a qualitative research approach with 51 various regional urban project stakeholders within 4 Focus Groups. This exploratory study provides basis about urban project process and Living Lab interactions and gives a better understanding of the professional context. Based on these findings, we summarize that specific innovation management gives means to allow renew practices in urban project process. Living Lab implementation can generate an open-innovated and collaborative environment centred on “Use”. It gives the design sense to improve solution appropriation by finals users. Also, it allows large stakeholders mobilization to produce, capitalize and distribute “Uses”, as language and knowledge.
“智能化”城市项目过程与生活实验室方法:通过案例研究的探索
本文探讨了近郊城市项目实践与创新解决方案之间的关系。城市项目过程强加了线性和有序的工程框架,并通过监管主体的极化来调节利益相关者之间的联系。然而,它并没有产生将地方和全球利益联系起来的创新解决方案。在这里,我们从城市项目和创新研究的理论领域出发,通过对4个焦点小组中的51个不同区域城市项目利益相关者的定性研究方法,改进了第一次观察结果。这一探索性研究为城市项目过程和生活实验室的互动提供了基础,并有助于更好地理解专业语境。在此基础上,我们总结了具体的创新管理为城市项目过程中的创新实践提供了手段。Living Lab的实现可以产生一个以“使用”为中心的开放式创新和协作环境。提高最终用户对解决方案的占用,具有设计意义。此外,它还允许动员大利益相关者生产、资本化和分发“用途”,如语言和知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信