“Challenge Accepted” Movement on Instagram: An Embodied Virtual Protest

I. Ustel
{"title":"“Challenge Accepted” Movement on Instagram: An Embodied Virtual Protest","authors":"I. Ustel","doi":"10.17077/2168-569x.1569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates whether social media provides an alternative protest forum minimizing bodily harm for vulnerable groups through an analysis of the “Challenge Accepted” movement on Instagram. The Instagram challenge constituted a part of the physical and online protests against the actions of the authorities and mechanisms in Turkey, especially after the Turkish government’s decision to withdraw from the Istanbul Convention, which increased women’s vulnerability. Based on Judith Butler’s writings, I propose four main properties for an effective protest: 1. Visibility of the protesters and their bodies, 2. Plural action, 3. Occupation of “public” spaces, 4. Vulnerability of the protesters. Looking into the properties and tactics that carry over from physical to virtual protests, I argue that social media offers its users an alternatively embodied political presence in public that minimizes harm and allows for plural political action, and has tangible socio-political consequences and effects on protesters’ bodies and lives. Although I ultimately argue that hybrid physical-online protests are more effective and less risky for the protesters, this paper is an attempt to re-think and imagine alternative protest platforms that reduce vulnerability and increase social and political impact, which is much needed under certain circumstances that increase protesters’ vulnerability and discourage physical participation, such as police brutality, governmental oppression and the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":155406,"journal":{"name":"Justice Framed","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice Framed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569x.1569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper investigates whether social media provides an alternative protest forum minimizing bodily harm for vulnerable groups through an analysis of the “Challenge Accepted” movement on Instagram. The Instagram challenge constituted a part of the physical and online protests against the actions of the authorities and mechanisms in Turkey, especially after the Turkish government’s decision to withdraw from the Istanbul Convention, which increased women’s vulnerability. Based on Judith Butler’s writings, I propose four main properties for an effective protest: 1. Visibility of the protesters and their bodies, 2. Plural action, 3. Occupation of “public” spaces, 4. Vulnerability of the protesters. Looking into the properties and tactics that carry over from physical to virtual protests, I argue that social media offers its users an alternatively embodied political presence in public that minimizes harm and allows for plural political action, and has tangible socio-political consequences and effects on protesters’ bodies and lives. Although I ultimately argue that hybrid physical-online protests are more effective and less risky for the protesters, this paper is an attempt to re-think and imagine alternative protest platforms that reduce vulnerability and increase social and political impact, which is much needed under certain circumstances that increase protesters’ vulnerability and discourage physical participation, such as police brutality, governmental oppression and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Instagram上的“接受挑战”运动:一种具体化的虚拟抗议
本文通过对Instagram上的“挑战接受”运动的分析,探讨社交媒体是否为弱势群体提供了一个最小化身体伤害的替代抗议论坛。Instagram的挑战是针对土耳其当局和机制的行动的实体和在线抗议的一部分,特别是在土耳其政府决定退出《伊斯坦布尔公约》之后,这增加了妇女的脆弱性。根据朱迪思·巴特勒的著作,我提出了有效抗议的四个主要特征:1。抗议者和他们的身体的可见性,2。复数动作,3。“公共”空间的占领;抗议者的脆弱性。在研究从实体抗议到虚拟抗议的属性和策略时,我认为社交媒体为其用户提供了一种替代性的公共政治存在,可以最大限度地减少伤害,允许多元政治行动,并对抗议者的身体和生活产生切实的社会政治后果和影响。虽然我最终认为,对抗议者来说,混合的实体-在线抗议更有效,风险更小,但本文试图重新思考和想象其他抗议平台,以减少脆弱性,增加社会和政治影响,这在某些情况下是非常需要的,这些情况会增加抗议者的脆弱性,并阻碍实际参与,例如警察暴行、政府压迫和COVID-19大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信