Comparative Analysis between Machine Learning Methods in Tones Classification

I. Balabanova, V. Markova, S. Kostadinova, G. Georgiev
{"title":"Comparative Analysis between Machine Learning Methods in Tones Classification","authors":"I. Balabanova, V. Markova, S. Kostadinova, G. Georgiev","doi":"10.1109/TELECOM50385.2020.9299535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an analysis between the indicators in synthesis of models based on machine learning techniques for RMS noise levels recognition of tones with different frequencies. Discriminant classification models were performed in MATLAB as pseudo-quadratic model with the highest accuracy of 84.650% was selected. Naïve Bayes algorithm with Gaussian and Kernel distributions is implemented in the classification process, as the better results were obtained in the second approach. In selection of the metric distance by the k-NN method an accuracy range from 89.800% to 91.050% is observed.","PeriodicalId":300010,"journal":{"name":"2020 28th National Conference with International Participation (TELECOM)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 28th National Conference with International Participation (TELECOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELECOM50385.2020.9299535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis between the indicators in synthesis of models based on machine learning techniques for RMS noise levels recognition of tones with different frequencies. Discriminant classification models were performed in MATLAB as pseudo-quadratic model with the highest accuracy of 84.650% was selected. Naïve Bayes algorithm with Gaussian and Kernel distributions is implemented in the classification process, as the better results were obtained in the second approach. In selection of the metric distance by the k-NN method an accuracy range from 89.800% to 91.050% is observed.
机器学习方法在音调分类中的比较分析
本文分析了基于机器学习技术的不同频率音调RMS噪声水平识别模型综合指标之间的关系。在MATLAB中进行判别分类模型,选择准确率最高的伪二次模型为84.650%。Naïve在分类过程中采用高斯分布和核分布的贝叶斯算法,第二种方法的分类效果更好。在度量距离的选择上,k-NN方法的精度范围为89.800% ~ 91.050%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信