A Novel Naive Bayes Voting Strategy for Combining Classifiers

C. Stefano, F. Fontanella, A. S. D. Freca
{"title":"A Novel Naive Bayes Voting Strategy for Combining Classifiers","authors":"C. Stefano, F. Fontanella, A. S. D. Freca","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2012.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classifier combination methods have proved to be an effective tool for increasing the performance in pattern recognition applications. The rationale of this approach follows from the observation that appropriately diverse classifiers make uncorrelated errors. Unfortunately, this theoretical assumption is not easy to satisfy in practical cases, thus reducing the performance obtainable with any combination strategy. In this paper we propose a new weighted majority vote rule which try to solve this problem by jointly analyzing the responses provided by all the experts, in order to capture their collective behavior when classifying a sample. Our rule associates a weight to each class rather than to each expert and computes such weights by estimating the joint probability distribution of each class with the set of responses provided by all the experts in the combining pool. The probability distribution has been computed by using the naive Bayes probabilistic model. Despite its simplicity, this model has been successfully used in many practical applications, often competing with much more sophisticated techniques. The experimental results, performed by using three standard databases of handwritten digits, confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":291062,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2012.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Classifier combination methods have proved to be an effective tool for increasing the performance in pattern recognition applications. The rationale of this approach follows from the observation that appropriately diverse classifiers make uncorrelated errors. Unfortunately, this theoretical assumption is not easy to satisfy in practical cases, thus reducing the performance obtainable with any combination strategy. In this paper we propose a new weighted majority vote rule which try to solve this problem by jointly analyzing the responses provided by all the experts, in order to capture their collective behavior when classifying a sample. Our rule associates a weight to each class rather than to each expert and computes such weights by estimating the joint probability distribution of each class with the set of responses provided by all the experts in the combining pool. The probability distribution has been computed by using the naive Bayes probabilistic model. Despite its simplicity, this model has been successfully used in many practical applications, often competing with much more sophisticated techniques. The experimental results, performed by using three standard databases of handwritten digits, confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method.
一种新的朴素贝叶斯组合分类器投票策略
分类器组合方法已被证明是提高模式识别性能的有效工具。这种方法的基本原理来自于观察到适当的不同分类器会产生不相关的错误。不幸的是,这种理论假设在实际情况中不容易满足,从而降低了任何组合策略可获得的性能。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的加权多数投票规则,试图通过联合分析所有专家提供的回答来解决这一问题,以捕获他们在分类样本时的集体行为。我们的规则将权重关联到每个类而不是每个专家,并通过使用组合池中所有专家提供的响应集估计每个类的联合概率分布来计算权重。利用朴素贝叶斯概率模型计算了概率分布。尽管它很简单,但这个模型已经成功地应用于许多实际应用中,经常与更复杂的技术竞争。使用三个标准的手写体数字数据库进行的实验结果证实了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信