Evaluating Forestry Holding of Cendana Library’s Collection Using Conspectus

Rattah Pinnusa Handisa
{"title":"Evaluating Forestry Holding of Cendana Library’s Collection Using Conspectus","authors":"Rattah Pinnusa Handisa","doi":"10.20473/rlj.v5-i1.2019.43-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of the study: Evaluating collection is required by libraries to assess the strengths and the weaknesses of collections. This research gives a benefit for libraries to improve their collection development policies. Thus, the libraries can provide adequate numbers of collections to meet the patrons’ demands.Purpose: The purpose of this report is to evaluate the forestry holdings in the Cendana library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) by using conspectus.Method: This research is an explanatory study cases in order to describe strength and weakness of forestry holding at Cendana library. The evaluator uses the Australian conspectus due to relevancy. The conspectus has several techniques for collecting data. A checklist is used by evaluator to evaluate monographs and electronic books. In addition, the evaluator evaluates the existing collection strengths (ECS), chronological coverages, languages, and physical conditions. The evaluator records these components into the evaluative worksheet.Findings: The result reveals that the forestry holdings in Cendana Library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) has conspectus levels in 1b. Although type of the languages become a strength, but the quantity is a weakness. The data shows that the size level of forestry holdings in the Cendana Library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) is in the level 1 b.Conclusion: In conclusion, the collection weakness is in books’ quantities. The limited number of forestry books enforces the conspectus levels of forestry holdings in a low level (1b). Meanwhile, strengths of existing collection are the equal portions between foreign language in English and Bahasa and the physical condition of books. It is recommended that Cendana' library should increase the numbers of collections through procurement or book’s exchange program.","PeriodicalId":250848,"journal":{"name":"Record and Library Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Record and Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v5-i1.2019.43-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background of the study: Evaluating collection is required by libraries to assess the strengths and the weaknesses of collections. This research gives a benefit for libraries to improve their collection development policies. Thus, the libraries can provide adequate numbers of collections to meet the patrons’ demands.Purpose: The purpose of this report is to evaluate the forestry holdings in the Cendana library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) by using conspectus.Method: This research is an explanatory study cases in order to describe strength and weakness of forestry holding at Cendana library. The evaluator uses the Australian conspectus due to relevancy. The conspectus has several techniques for collecting data. A checklist is used by evaluator to evaluate monographs and electronic books. In addition, the evaluator evaluates the existing collection strengths (ECS), chronological coverages, languages, and physical conditions. The evaluator records these components into the evaluative worksheet.Findings: The result reveals that the forestry holdings in Cendana Library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) has conspectus levels in 1b. Although type of the languages become a strength, but the quantity is a weakness. The data shows that the size level of forestry holdings in the Cendana Library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) is in the level 1 b.Conclusion: In conclusion, the collection weakness is in books’ quantities. The limited number of forestry books enforces the conspectus levels of forestry holdings in a low level (1b). Meanwhile, strengths of existing collection are the equal portions between foreign language in English and Bahasa and the physical condition of books. It is recommended that Cendana' library should increase the numbers of collections through procurement or book’s exchange program.
用概观法评价中央图书馆馆藏林业馆藏
研究背景:馆藏评估是图书馆评估馆藏优势和劣势的需要。本研究对图书馆馆藏发展政策的改进具有一定的参考价值。因此,图书馆可以提供足够数量的馆藏来满足读者的需求。目的:本报告的目的是利用透视法对古邦森林研究所(FRIK) Cendana图书馆的林业馆藏进行评估。方法:本研究以解释性研究个案的方式,探讨金达纳图书馆林业馆藏的优势与劣势。由于相关性,评估者使用澳大利亚概貌。透视图有几种收集数据的技术。评估人员使用检查表来评估专著和电子书。此外,评估者评估现有的收藏优势(ECS)、时间覆盖范围、语言和物理条件。评估人员将这些组件记录到评估工作表中。结果发现:古邦森林研究所(FRIK)的Cendana图书馆的森林馆藏具有1 / 2的透视水平。虽然语言的种类成为优势,但数量是劣势。数据显示,库邦森林研究所钦达纳图书馆的林业馆藏规模水平处于1级b。结论:总之,馆藏的弱点在于图书数量。有限的林业图书数量使林业馆藏的总体水平处于较低水平(1b)。同时,现有馆藏的优势在于英语外文与马来文外文的比例相当,以及图书的实物状况。建议Cendana图书馆通过采购或图书交换计划增加馆藏数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信